I just saw this today. This could make CW contests interesting in the US. "Petition for Rule Making (RM-11769), filed on May 2. Arguing that retaining the current regime of legacy CW subbands has pr
There are only 2 band segments which are exclusively CW. Neither is on HF. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co
I think the CW only portions of the band were welcomed in the "Old Days" of AM phone. There were huge numbers of US stations on AM causing a huge cacophony of strong carriers and, if they were not li
When I tune around mobile on 20 meters for CW during a weekday, there is seldom anything below 14.050. On the weekends, it is a different ballgame. Maybe it would be good for phone contests to allow
I would rather see a petition to remove the SSB portions of the bands and make them all CW only Wes WL7F ________________________________________ From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com>
Am I missing something? Where are these "CW only subbands?" (other than the bottom of 6m and 2m?) - Matthew KK4FEM _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@c
This proposal is coming late because at the time when mandatory CW testing stopped there were very good automatic CW decoders coming available. The prediction of the death of CW due to no need to lea
In a followup filing, he explains that opening up the bottom of 2m and 6m to digital...er, "symbol communications" would somehow stimulate the use of those bands. Oh, and the narrative of the proposa
So, right, adding 100 kHz will really motivate all the people who don't already use the other 3.9 MHz. I read land legal descriptions and deeds every day for my job, and I got bogged down trying to d