- 1. [CQ-Contest] 99% of uniques are busted (score: 1)
- Author: kr2q@optimum.net
- Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:52:28 +0000 (GMT)
- Hi Saul, et al, Well, maybe it is not 99%. It could be 98% or even 97%...or perhaps 99.5%. I started following up on "uniques" decades ago. When I was actively engaged in this activity, I would conta
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00033.html (9,642 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] 99% of uniques are busted (score: 1)
- Author: mike l dormann <w7dra@juno.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:31:04 -0700
- i would think glowbugs like myself using WWII tube gear (and there are a lot of us, mostly on CW) would turn the rig on, hear a contest and work a single or maybe two or three stations, feel very vin
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00038.html (7,748 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] 99% of uniques are busted (score: 1)
- Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:37:14 -0500
- You do not need to send in a log to not see your call shown as a unique. If you have a unique in the log, it means that station worked you and absolutely nobody else who submitted a log. Possible? Ye
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00042.html (9,235 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] 99% of uniques are busted (score: 1)
- Author: Charles Gallo <Charlie@TheGallos.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:17:16 -0400
- ...snip... Mike, not that I've been on the air much lately, but in the short time I've been contesting, someone said "either follow up, or work at least 10 stations" -- 73 de KG2V For the Children -
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00045.html (7,919 bytes)
- 5. [CQ-Contest] 99% of uniques are busted (score: 1)
- Author: saul_abrams@dps.state.ny.us
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:00:34 -0400
- Someone mistakenly interpreted my earlier comment about uniques and high power versus QRP as a knock on the abilities of QRP ops. That was certainly not my intention. This is what I sent him: NO!!!!
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00053.html (8,026 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu