Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+1966\s+vs\s+2006\s+\[was\:\s+Why\s+did\s+the\s+Canadians\s+$PT5M$beat\s+the\s+Ame\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+1966\s+vs\s+2006\s+\[was\:\s+Why\s+did\s+the\s+Canadians\s+$PT5M$beat\s+the\s+Ame\.\.\.\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1966 vs 2006 [was: Why did the Canadians (PT5M)beat the Ame... (score: 1): Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com; Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:18:33 EDT; Given the state-of-the-art in 2006 (and My impression of modern transceivers is not altogether good. My stock Drake R-4B never had any trace of intermod or overload problems that many "modern" transc; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00315.html (7,129 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]