- 1. [CQ-Contest] 160m in SS? (score: 1)
- Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR)
- Date: Wed Jan 14 14:16:54 1998
- After participating in an NAQP and seeing the importance (and utility) of 160m contacts, I'm wondering aloud why 160m doesn't play a bigger role in Sweepstakes. Sure, the rules are obviously differen
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00283.html (6,927 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] 160m in SS? (score: 1)
- Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
- Date: Thu Jan 15 07:23:30 1998
- I think you answered your own question! No mults = no activity = no 160 and little 10 for now. 73, Ty K3MM -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-con
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00311.html (6,434 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu