Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+14\.300\s+MHz\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+14\.300\s+MHz\s*$/: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1): Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 23:17:46 -0500; Here's the problem -- there's already 250 kHz of HF spectrum that is 100% contest-free. They are the WARC bands - 30, 17 and 12m. There are also 5 additional 2.8 kHz channels on 60m. The channelised; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00446.html (10,389 bytes)
22. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1): Author: "Mike Fatchett, W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 21:08:21 -0700; It seems to me that people are relying on "cheap" ham radios for emergency communications.....If they can afford an expensive boat why in the world would you skimp on your emergency communications eq; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00449.html (11,871 bytes)
23. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 23:53:01 -0500; Bill, no sooner do you start carving out a 6 KHz hole (3 KHz is enough if they had real receivers and knew how to use them) and every crackpot group (including 14,230) will want their own 10 KHz wide; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00451.html (10,162 bytes)
24. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1): Author: "Mark Steven Williams" <k9gx@n4gn.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 05:35:06 +0100; K4IK makes an excellent point. The view from this operating desk is that every radio has a VFO knob, most have pass band tuning, many have IF filters, most have audio pass band filtering. I have neve; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00452.html (13,453 bytes)
25. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1): Author: "n6ki@juno.com" <n6ki@juno.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 08:24:01 GMT; Whoops! Posted this to wrong thread...just wan't to make sure that NN2NN and VE3II don't miss this shread of wisdom.... Wow! What a pis*ing contest and waste of bandwidth we have going here re the 14; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00454.html (10,072 bytes)
26. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 08:07:51 -0800 (PST); They already did, on the very first amateur operation from space by W5LFL. John NE0P __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://small; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00458.html (9,006 bytes)
27. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 10:08:36 -0600 (CST); They already are (when a ham is on board)! But not as priority comm. Mainly to give other hams the thrill of talking to the shuttle. 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ CQ-C; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00459.html (9,727 bytes)
28. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 10:12:02 -0600 (CST); Hey, it isn't so bad! I worked FT5XO there the other night. They were legitimately peaking over S9 here on my dipole. 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00460.html (9,338 bytes)
29. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1): Author: Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 08:37:02 -0800; That happened back around 1983. Members of the Motorola Amateur Radio Club, located in Plantation, FL, hand built a pair of Motorola MX360 handi talkies specifically for space shuttle operation. Dr.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00463.html (10,110 bytes)
30. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1): Author: WI8W <wi8w@wi8w.org>; Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:48:46 +0000; Having the Maritime net move to 17 meter band will not work either...there is a unofficial movement (by the amateurs that use the bands) to prevent any kind of net operations on the WARC bands. The C; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00465.html (10,148 bytes)
31. [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1): Author: "Thomas R. Williams" <n2cu@magtrol.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:08:42 -0500; Recently, the FCC notified a number of stations that it was illegal to communicate with unlicensed persons operating on amateur frequencies. http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement_logs/2005/0219.html?n; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00468.html (7,030 bytes)
32. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1): Author: "Lawrence Stoskopf" <stoskopf@tri.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:08:56 GMT; Gee, what other times of the week do you have so many people with such good gear scanning the band in all directions for that weak signal? N0UU _______________________________________________ CQ-Cont; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00469.html (8,102 bytes)
33. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1): Author: "David Hachadorian" <k6ll@adelphia.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:22:03 -0700; There's an intrinsic conflict in a mix of contesters and nets on SSB. Contesters spend the entire weekend on a band which is jammed full of signals. They have the best QRM-fighting tools available an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00470.html (9,014 bytes)
34. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Santelmann KC1F" <kc1f@adelphia.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 23:48:19 -0000; Speaking of 14300 and above, isn't this still a "contest free zone", at least for Region 1 ? I used to get yelled at for contesting above 14300, but don't think I've heard that for 15 years or so. No; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00476.html (9,390 bytes)
35. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:03:21 +0000; Having at one time been a keen sailor myself, who has also been the one on the hard whilst friends & family sailed the Pacific & South China Sea, this thread has been interesting. I have pitched in w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00477.html (9,213 bytes)
36. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1): Author: W0MU-Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:13:12 -0700; NASA does not use Ham HT's for their only form of communications on the shuttle. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00478.html (9,012 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 36
Page: [1] [2]