Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+14\.300\s+MHz\s*$/: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1)
Author: "Steve NN2NN" <swojton@wzrd.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 20:33:10 -0500
Dear Contesters, I have been in many contests over the years. RTTY, CW and SSB. They have helped me sharpen my operating skills. And they are fun! I am now a Net Control Station for the Intercontinen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00400.html (8,780 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1)
Author: "n6ki@juno.com" <n6ki@juno.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 03:16:17 GMT
A noble cause but difficult to enforce. Your other choices, if the word just doesn't get out to ALL contestors, is to waste a lot of time chasing uninformed contestors away from your freq, which in e
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00401.html (8,995 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1)
Author: "Tom VE3II" <ve3ii@zing-net.ca>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 01:59:50 -0500
Hi Dennis.... Oh, if were just that easy. Dennis, 14.300 has, over the years, become the de facto emergency frequency on 20 meters. Several marine radio manufacturers have now specified 14.300 as a m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00405.html (13,250 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1)
Author: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:40:33 -0000
Tom, "Several marine radio manufacturers have now specified 14.300 as a marine emergency frequency and written it in the manuals for their new radios." Sounds like commercial interests have decided t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00409.html (14,728 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 08:43:32 -0500
That's a problem for the manufacturers who recommend ILLEGAL operation. Non-Amateur stations have no right, under any circumstances to use amateur frequencies. The US Coast Guard, other governments,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00410.html (11,949 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 06:06:33 -0800
If your use of the Amateur frequencies is SO MUCH MORE IMPORTANT than any other Amateur activity, perhaps you should be using a different radio service to accomplish these objectives. Perhaps the Mar
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00411.html (10,409 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1)
Author: asciibaron@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 14:17:36 +0000
i checked the US Coast Guards website - it makes no reference to 14.300 as an official emergency frequency. i googled "coast guard 14.300" and it returned several websites, but no official USCG site
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00412.html (9,621 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1)
Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:13:23 -0500
I'm no sailor, but to me the bigger issue is why so many people are heading out into the open ocean with only ham radios for communication... 73, Blake N4GI __________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00419.html (9,024 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1)
Author: "Steve NN2NN" <swojton@wzrd.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:14:49 -0500 (EST)
Ken, Thanks for your response. Don't think I ws asking a whole lot with my original posting here. We all know that no one own's any particular frequency. What is important to anyone is a personal cho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00420.html (11,382 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:25:01 EST
Several thoughts: For much of the week, the problem of a boater going to 14300 (absent the net) and finding nobody there might be real. During a phone contest weekend, he is sure to find somebody the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00421.html (10,120 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1)
Author: "Rich Gelber" <k2wr@njdxa.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:25:12 -0500
The essence of the problem is two sentences contained within VE3II's message: "Unlike contesting, what we do on 14.300 is serious, life and death work. We don't collect points, we don't go for the ra
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00423.html (9,489 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1)
Author: Mark Perrin <mperrin@ordata.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:50:11 -0800
Because that is the reliable way of communications for yotties. Been that way for years, and makes sense for sailors. What would you recommend? Mark N7MQ _____________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00425.html (9,772 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Pack, NX5M" <nx5m@txcyber.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:09:38 -0600
Bottom line...... Whoever is using the frequency first is the one that gets it. If someone is operating on that frequency and is asked to qsy for a net that is about to start...it is up to the operat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00427.html (12,323 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 14:58:55 EST
Why not? It's no more an education process than establishing 14.300. If you don't start now, it will never happen. Run part of your daily/weekly schedule on 18.165. << They could post notice to that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00428.html (9,613 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 15:07:07 -0500
... and if my life were on the line, I hope it would be a contester with his three high stack of big yagis and well trained ears trying to pull through my weak signal and not some easy chair mission
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00429.html (10,280 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1)
Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 15:26:49 -0500
"If you plan to travel more than a few miles offshore, plan to purchase an MF/HF radiotelephone or mobile satellite telephone, an emergency position indicating radio beacon, or EPIRB, and a second V
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00430.html (11,129 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:32:28 -0500
As I pointed out, every US amateur acknowledges that he has no "right" to any specific frequency. That applies to these so called public service nets as well. However, someone else pointed out to me
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00436.html (10,594 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1)
Author: Alan Zack <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 17:58:09 -0800
Better to go direct to: http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/marcomms/default.htm and skip all the ads. -- __________________________________________________________________________ Alan Zack Amateur Radio Sta
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00437.html (11,816 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1)
Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 21:10:21 EST
After seeing the original post, corresponding with the original poster, seeing the responses and digesting all of it, I would like to toss in my two cents. I don't really give a rat's butt about the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00438.html (10,750 bytes)

20. [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1)
Author: "Ken Claerbout" <K4ZW@Staffnet.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 22:01:50 -0500
People tend to lose sight of the fact that anyone venturing onto 20 meters during a phone contest is likely to experience a challenge. The 14300 crew certainly cannot claim they are any worse off tha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00441.html (10,829 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu