Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\[YCCC\]\s+Why\s+ARRL\s+SSB\s+Contest\s+is\s+Not\s+My\s+Favorite\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Why ARRL SSB Contest is Not My Favorite (score: 1)
Author: n1pga@aol.com
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 01:59:50 +0000
You found it boring? Huh? Must not be talking about the same contest I was in. I for one had a blast, sorry you didn't. I've been trying to read most all of the 3830 score posting soapbox comments an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00068.html (9,856 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Why ARRL SSB Contest is Not My Favorite (score: 1)
Author: Joe Fitzgerald <jfitzgerald@alum.wpi.edu>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 21:43:37 -0500
On 3/5/2013 6:45 PM, hankkier@aol.com wrote: 1 - almost impossible to find a run frequency without stepping on someone's toes, except on 10 meters One memorable moment for me was a K2 station that gr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00069.html (8,252 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Why ARRL SSB Contest is Not My Favorite (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 14:29:38 -0500
A few years ago, some idiot on the CAC tried to explore the possibility of making ARRL DX a more interesting (i.e., fun) contest. I'm not talking about radical proposals like distance-based scoring t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00091.html (13,560 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Why ARRL SSB Contest is Not My Favorite (score: 1)
Author: Frank Fallon <n2ff@optonline.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 20:11:45 +0000
Dick, My memory of that CAC discussion was that it was a staff member at ARRL who suggested that CAC look at the issue of the ARRL DX rules to improve participation I remember seeing graphs showing t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00095.html (15,261 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Why ARRL SSB Contest is Not My Favorite (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Gilmer, N2MG" <n2mg@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 15:20:57 -0500
I think Dick was being self-deprecating...unless my memory's totally hosed. Mike N2MG _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00096.html (11,291 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Why ARRL SSB Contest is Not My Favorite (score: 1)
Author: k1vv@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 21:45:28 +0000 (UTC)
We don't think we will ever get bored with ham radio..... even after 58 years on the bands .... It still has that "mysterious" something to it ........ If I make noise or blow a horn ... or even flas
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00100.html (11,645 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Why ARRL SSB Contest is Not My Favorite (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 16:54:17 -0500
Frank, Actually, I was the person who suggested the study. I did so for four reasons: 1) Because I noticed that ARRL DX had fallen to third place in log submissions behind CQ WW and CQ WPX, 2) Becaus
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00101.html (17,555 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Why ARRL SSB Contest is Not My Favorite (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 20:31:14 -0700
If you like to run rate then go to the Caribbean or Central America and have a blast! Three years I was at V47 land and all I can say is what a blast! 10m near the bottom of the cycle open to the US
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00109.html (14,378 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu