- 1. Re: [CQ-Contest] [Bulk] Re: cqcontest.net (score: 1)
- Author: "V Sidarau" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 09:20:11 -0400
- As the dead horse appears to be still alive and kicking, let me repeat the statement I used to make here in the list before, perhaps even not once. The Assistance (or whatever you call it) is ... Mak
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00045.html (10,115 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] [Bulk] Re: cqcontest.net (score: 1)
- Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 12:50:42 -0500
- Supposing there were a website that listed real-time scores of other stations - and that's all - with NO info on bands, band changes, frequencies, times or anything other than their score at the mome
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00050.html (12,261 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] [Bulk] Re: cqcontest.net (score: 1)
- Author: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 18:45:11 +0000
- I resemble that remark. Except the "outdated" appellation. I don't trash your chosen category. Why is it necessary to denigrate those preferences don't match yours? __________________________________
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00051.html (9,855 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] [Bulk] Re: cqcontest.net (score: 1)
- Author: "V Sidarau" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 15:31:29 -0400
- Hans, Havent you noticed a (bitter) grain of irony behind my statement? If not, sorry, I made the grain too small. If I ever show up in this list, I do it to protect the SO group as Is and trying to
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00052.html (10,529 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CQ-Contest] [Bulk] Re: cqcontest.net (score: 1)
- Author: "Stephen Bloom" <sbloom@acsalaska.net>
- Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 15:32:37 -0800
- Vlad: See ..now that is something I've found valuable here. I started out pretty skeptical about the need for Unassisted ..some of the comments here have convinced me that it is worth keeping and sho
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00060.html (11,499 bytes)
- 6. Re: [CQ-Contest] [Bulk] Re: cqcontest.net (score: 1)
- Author: "V Sidarau" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 11:38:55 -0400
- Randy, You are actively promoting the merge for quite some time, but I cannot recall your explanation, why. - Costs of mailing more certificates? CQ no longer provides paper certificates. - More work
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00089.html (20,718 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu