Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\[Bulk\]\s+Re\:\s+CQ\s+WW\s+CW\s+2014\s+Results\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\[Bulk\]\s+Re\:\s+CQ\s+WW\s+CW\s+2014\s+Results\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] [Bulk] Re: CQ WW CW 2014 Results (score: 1): Author: "V. Sidarau" <vs_otw@rogers.com>; Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 18:36:29 -0400; Steve, Certainly there is a deficiency in the wording quoted below. I'd tend to add the following: ... as well as use of any other information from an external source which may affect your contest sc; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00189.html (10,430 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] [Bulk] Re: CQ WW CW 2014 Results (score: 1): Author: Steve IK4WMH <ik4wmh@virgilio.it>; Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 22:51:19 +0200; Hello Vlad, That may or may not be reasonable, the point is it's not written in the rules. What are written rules good for if you can't trust what you read? The written rules don't say it is prohibit; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00226.html (11,033 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]