Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\[Bulk\]\s+Re\:\s+\[Bulk\]\s+Re\:\s+Q\-Signals\s+for\s+Contesting\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\[Bulk\]\s+Re\:\s+\[Bulk\]\s+Re\:\s+Q\-Signals\s+for\s+Contesting\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: Q-Signals for Contesting (score: 1): Author: "V. Sidarau" <vs_otw@rogers.com>; Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 10:02:38 -0400; Sig, It's even easier. -- Your SSB signal is barely understandable". It sounds overly processed. QSL? -- Your message is explicitly clear, you use the Q code and you force the other party to acknowle; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00346.html (14,229 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]