Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\"Packet\s+ruined\s+ham\s+radio\"\s+$version\s+N\+1$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\"Packet\s+ruined\s+ham\s+radio\"\s+$version\s+N\+1$\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] "Packet ruined ham radio" (version N+1) (score: 1): Author: Art Boyars <artboyars@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:36:05 -0500; I'm sure all you modern op's are tired of hearing me beat this dead horse (see note below sig), but... KK9A laments (with justification): "[N1MM logging program not showing WP2AA as US VI] is a terri; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00116.html (8,369 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] "Packet ruined ham radio" (version N+1) (score: 1): Author: Steve Lott <lottsphoto@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:07:14 -0600; Art, You are welcome to go back to the AM days and forget the modern Upper side USB or Lower Side LSB tools as well Packet cluster, modern logging tools etc etc are just that, Tools if we know their; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00127.html (10,542 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] "Packet ruined ham radio" (version N+1) (score: 1): Author: "Charles R.Tropp via CQ-Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 15:46:17 +0000 (UTC); I knowI'm a minority, but I liked it better the old way. HiArt, Yes, nostalgiais a legitimate and quite common sentiment. As an officer of the QuarterCentury Wireless Association (QCWA) I have hear; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00129.html (10,702 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] "Packet ruined ham radio" (version N+1) (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 10:08:25 -0600; Wow Paper Dupe Sheets! UG! Now it amazes me that I could get over 1K contacts in a 24 hr test using them things! But I did learn how to send with my right hand on the paddles, while at the same time; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00133.html (11,347 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] "Packet ruined ham radio" (version N+1) (score: 1): Author: Art Boyars <artboyars@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 15:04:10 -0500; Well, I think N1UR said it best. And that is what I do when operating from home. And I think KG5VK missed the point. I'm not against computer logging and computer-controlled radios. I use that at hom; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00145.html (8,926 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]