Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:z.pitman@libertel.nl: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 1997 results...some analyse (score: 1)
Author: z.pitman@libertel.nl (z.pitman@libertel.nl)
Date: Mon Nov 2 13:34:02 1998
Hi Timo et al, Isn't there a DQ-limit for this ? I remember in some contest if the claimed score is 5% (or so) less then the claimed it resulted autoamtic DQ. 73s Zoli HA1AG <snip> <snip> -- CQ-Conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00009.html (8,472 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Contest-free 10M ARRL (score: 1)
Author: z.pitman@libertel.nl (z.pitman@libertel.nl)
Date: Mon Dec 14 11:15:25 1998
Easy... The LU novices should use split like we in EU do it on 80m phone. 73s Zoli HA1AG -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-12/msg00093.html (8,627 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Contest station in PA/ON/DL for WPX CW ? (score: 1)
Author: z.pitman@libertel.nl (z.pitman@libertel.nl)
Date: Tue Mar 25 16:12:15 1997
Hi folks, I'm seeking for a contest station in a need of a CW contest op. I'm an avid CW op with 10+ years of M/S and M/M experience with different HG contest stations. Now I live in Maastricht, Neth
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00353.html (7,021 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX CONTEST SURVEY RESULTS 1 (score: 1)
Author: z.pitman@libertel.nl (z.pitman@libertel.nl)
Date: Thu Apr 3 09:14:49 1997
Item Subject: Message text Tom, What I really missed from your survey is the geographical distribution of the votes. It would be as informative as the number of votes, I believe. 73s Zoli HA1AG -- CQ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00180.html (8,577 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] IARU rules (score: 1)
Author: z.pitman@libertel.nl (z.pitman@libertel.nl)
Date: Wed Jul 2 10:04:13 1997
No, hopefully you're right. "Stations" should mean a radio sites regardless of the number of operators. IMO, it should be 15 min's with 5 min's tolerance of the time-stamps on both sides...(maybe ARR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00023.html (6,901 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] keying... (score: 1)
Author: z.pitman@libertel.nl (z.pitman@libertel.nl)
Date: Mon Jul 21 18:06:09 1997
Just a pratical observation: in my opinion it's better to send the dots (short ones) with the forefinger. That finger is somehow more agile. IMO, it doesn't effect the "side-changing" ability. When I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00228.html (7,464 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] keying... (score: 1)
Author: z.pitman@libertel.nl (z.pitman@libertel.nl)
Date: Mon Jul 21 18:06:09 1997
Just a pratical observation: in my opinion it's better to send the dots (short ones) with the forefinger. That finger is somehow more agile. IMO, it doesn't effect the "side-changing" ability. When I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00468.html (7,461 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] keying... (score: 1)
Author: z.pitman@libertel.nl (z.pitman@libertel.nl)
Date: Mon Jul 21 18:06:09 1997
Just a pratical observation: in my opinion it's better to send the dots (short ones) with the forefinger. That finger is somehow more agile. IMO, it doesn't effect the "side-changing" ability. When I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00701.html (7,467 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu