Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wc1m73@gmail.com: 123 ]

Total 123 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposed rule changes (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 14:15:28 -0400
I'd love to see a rule that the log has to be submitted immediately, but the argument has been that some competitive stations don't have access to the Internet -- for example, someone doing a Dxpedit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00571.html (13,094 bytes)

82. Re: [CQ-Contest] Preview of CQWW Rules 2015 (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 14:50:28 -0400
I generally agree with what Ed is saying. I don't think SCP is assistance, either, but unfortunately the revised rule appears to prohibit using it for the purpose of going back and correcting a typo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00573.html (14,895 bytes)

83. Re: [CQ-Contest] Second Draft of CQ WW Rules Changes (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 13:19:16 -0400
Ditto -- my thanks as well to Randy and the committee for volunteering their time to make CQ WW the king of contests. The new draft addresses the issues I had with the first one, so I'll shut up 73,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00614.html (9,664 bytes)

84. Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposed contest rules (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 14:10:53 -0400
right, the entrant This doesn't concern the recent rule change drafts, so I'll throw in my answer to Randy's question: I think Randy's strongest argument is that a long list of complex rules may put
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00619.html (10,504 bytes)

85. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spots, Lies and Audio Tapes - a proposal (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 02:41:39 -0400
Scott makes a very persuasive case for why recordings are needed. His examples have really helped me to understand how recordings can expose cheating. I agree with Scott -- let's not throw the baby o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00702.html (19,185 bytes)

86. Re: [CQ-Contest] Distance-Based Ranking (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:56:51 -0500
I agree that Distance-Based scoring can't work, but while Distance-based ranking has some attractive features there are problems with that approach, too. WRTC uses Distance-Based ranking to select te
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00168.html (12,784 bytes)

87. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC qualifying (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 15:41:47 -0500
Too little for what the event has become. But it really depends on the equipment and amenities provided, as well as the number of teams. Portable toilets that people won't complain about cost a lot
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00192.html (7,911 bytes)

88. Re: [CQ-Contest] Alpha 87A Alpha Max (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 16:36:31 -0400
Jim, The usefulness of Alpha Max depends on your antenna system. If you have only one antenna per band, it's really not necessary. The base design of the 87A includes precise tuning for enough freque
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00095.html (12,531 bytes)

89. Re: [CQ-Contest] Alpha 87A Alpha Max (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 16:54:35 -0400
FWIW, I've owned an 87A since 1995 and have never sent it back for repair. In all but one case I've been able to do my own repairs, sometimes on my own and sometimes with advice from factory personne
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00097.html (11,324 bytes)

90. Re: [CQ-Contest] Alpha 87A Alpha Max -- Mea Culpa (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 13:53:33 -0400
Our Alpha Day wasn't just for 87As. It was for any Alpha amp, and our large club (YCCC) had plenty of owners with Alpha amps of all vintages. Also, the tech (it was Brad) setup shop at the house of a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00152.html (8,816 bytes)

91. Re: [CQ-Contest] Alpha Amp Owners and Service (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 14:22:34 -0400
Glenn AE0Q knows a lot about the 87A, too. As of about 3 years ago he was still with the company. I hope he's with the new owner now. Brad knows more about the 87A than anyone on the planet. I'm sure
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00153.html (12,078 bytes)

92. Re: [CQ-Contest] Plaque (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 17:55:36 -0500
Your welcome, Stan. Great job, as always! 73, Dick WC1M I wanted to thank Dick Green, WC1M, for his sponsorship of the plaque I received today for last year's CW WPX Contest. This was for Low Power,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-02/msg00169.html (7,372 bytes)

93. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 14:08:43 -0500
I don't pretend to know all the psychology behind cheating, but in some parts of the world finding loopholes and ways to subvert the rules is common practice and a sort of badge of honor in itself. C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-02/msg00243.html (9,790 bytes)

94. Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs on Two or More Frequencies in the Same Band (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 19:08:09 -0400
I strongly support Frank's proposal, but the prohibition should apply to Single Ops, too, as it does in CQ WW. I realize that multi-op stations are more likely to be equipped to do alternating CQs on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00349.html (10,729 bytes)

95. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW LCR's and log scrubbing (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 15:31:33 -0400
I sympathize with your not getting credit for the QSOs, but an accusation of cheating is off the mark in this case. After all, if they intended to cheat, why did they remove the QSOs from the logs? P
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00130.html (11,641 bytes)

96. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW LCR's and log scrubbing (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 01:47:17 -0400
The log checking program could be smarter about common mistakes like that. At the very least, an "X" in column 1 without a hyphen ought to generate an error so the person doing the log checking can m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00180.html (13,800 bytes)

97. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW LCR's and log scrubbing (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 14:55:44 -0400
It's obvious. As I suggested earlier, occasional mistakes marked with X-QSO near the start or end of a 10-minute window shouldn't result in a penalty, other than losing the QSOs. Evidence of station
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00219.html (25,666 bytes)

98. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 15:37:12 -0400
The rules for operating KU1CW are governed by FCC Part 97. Although not explicitly stated in Part 97, its clear that CEPT rules would only apply if the remote operator is the control operator. As lon
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00102.html (15,226 bytes)

99. Re: [CQ-Contest] third-party communications in DX contests (was: KU1CW location) (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 13:40:13 -0400
Ed, Although tangentially related, this issue is different from the KU1CW debate, so I've changed the topic line. I suspect the third party traffic issue has been debated before, but here's my two ce
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00120.html (8,996 bytes)

100. Re: [CQ-Contest] third-party communications in DX contests (was: KU1CW location) (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 03:42:25 -0400
Ed, The key words in the third party definition are "sent by the control operator... on behalf of another person (the third party)." The definition of third party doesn't say anything about the licen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00130.html (13,949 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu