Mail Archive Search: <+from:waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL>

Results:

References: [ +from:waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL: 68 ]

Total 68 documents matching your query.

1. Engineering Beverage Antennas (score: 1): Author: Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL (Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL); Date: Wed Feb 1 10:07:31 1995; Hi Fred. What caught the eye of WA6OTU that led to his conclusion that the beverage he saw were poorly engineered? There are no specifics. I am always looking for things to do to improve the shack. W; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-02/msg00001.html (11,799 bytes)
2. EWE & Beverage Tips (score: 1): Author: Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL (Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL); Date: Mon Feb 6 12:19:17 1995; I enjoyed reading Steve, K0SF's, analysis and solution to the vertical downlead problem. I'll go one step further and recommend that, if at all possible, bring the terminating ends of the beverage do; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-02/msg00026.html (8,050 bytes)
3. K2WK ARRL CW SCORE, SOA (score: 1): Author: Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL (Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL); Date: Tue Feb 21 01:05:34 1995; 95 ARRL DX CW Score K2WK, SOA 160 39 34 80 292 72 40 287 68 20 683 91 15 472 85 10 44 28 Total 1817 378 = 2,051,406 (raw), in 30 hrs. My personal best for ARRL CW. Fantastic conditions! Best hour=133; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-02/msg00089.html (6,883 bytes)
4. Infrequent signing and dupes (score: 1): Author: Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL (Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL); Date: Wed Feb 22 16:06:09 1995; Gerry, W1GD brings up an excellent point: Whats the deal on this guy? Does he count for the contest? Since he never sent the correct excahnge, is it a valid QSO. If I get some guy who just sends me 5; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-02/msg00124.html (12,493 bytes)
5. Unacceptable QSO's ?? (score: 1): Author: Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL (Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL); Date: Fri Feb 24 13:28:33 1995; I'm counting V47KAO as a "grey-line" contact. de k2wk unsubscribe LOG WHAT IS SENT: 599, ENN, 5NN, and 100, ATT, KW, 1KW, AKW, OR WHATEVER. JIM, W3CPB headrick@radar.nrl.navy.mil Maybe we could also; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-02/msg00146.html (13,089 bytes)
6. He sends QRP R5. Now how do you log 1/2 watt? (score: 1): Author: Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL (Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL); Date: Fri Feb 24 14:46:01 1995; The best Power Report I got over the weekend was a dude sending R5. Hmm I sez, say that again, mahn. He sends QRP R5. Now how do you log a 1/2 watt? I put down 1, but really now, what is he supposed; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-02/msg00147.html (23,731 bytes)
7. Clearing the Frequency (score: 1): Author: Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL (Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL); Date: Wed Mar 1 10:56:08 1995; During the ARRL DX CW contest I had an interesting experience with a certain multi station from The Slovak Republic, which I won't name. I set up camp abt 1 khZ from him and could exist quite comfort; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-03/msg00001.html (10,171 bytes)
8. Numeric abbreviations (score: 1): Author: Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL (Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL); Date: Wed Mar 1 16:24:06 1995; I concur. Thats why in CQ Contest Survey I voted to keep the "useless" 5NN. I find that this precept is exactly what is needed for successful QSOs. I haven't said it in as eloquent terms as you, but; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-03/msg00004.html (13,245 bytes)
9. [To: WILLIAM_B_LUMNITZER: Re: ag6k (n6cq comments)] (score: 1): Author: Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL (Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL); Date: Thu Apr 13 17:03:46 1995; Fantastic news! I am so happy that Rich is getting "his day in court." The League should be ashamed of itself for not publishing his rebuttal. I guess the League is above us all and doesn't have to a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-04/msg00067.html (7,660 bytes)
10. Bragging rights (score: 1): Author: Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL (Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL); Date: Sun Apr 16 02:01:54 1995; Toot-toot. I wanna toot my horn. Got a nice certificate for #1 NNJ, SS CW Hi-pwr. Thanx for W2GD & W2RQ either entering QRP or not being on at all. Now if only QST got here so I could learn my score; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-04/msg00090.html (6,436 bytes)
11. BS7H complaints (score: 1): Author: Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL (Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL); Date: Sun Apr 16 02:16:22 1995; Did they take lessons from Ian Anderson? -k2wk (soon to be: "the ham formerly known as k2wk") new call: W2 or W6ITO I had a similar thing happen in the early 90's when I was a very close second for t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-04/msg00091.html (14,764 bytes)
12. Guying Towers On Rocky Terrain (score: 1): Author: Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL (Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL); Date: Fri Apr 21 17:19:11 1995; Hey all. Has anyone had experience installing guy anchors in rock? Is drilling a a viable alternative to blasting or using a jack hammer? Who would I contact for this type of work. What kind of devic; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-04/msg00130.html (7,473 bytes)
13. DSP-9+ RTTY Remodulator Fix (score: 1): Author: Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL (Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL); Date: Wed May 24 11:39:14 1995; I just got off the phone with Al Kaplan of Timewave, Inc. He informed me that there is a bug in the interigmn firmware release, Ver. 3.01. The problem manifests itself as a continuous carrier when th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-05/msg00015.html (13,806 bytes)
14. WPX CW/Propagation Forecasts (score: 1): Author: Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL (Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL); Date: Wed May 24 14:40:43 1995; I concur. Even though the WWV "forecasts" are updated every 3 hours, they're usually old news if some catastrophic event occurs. I only need to refer you to 1994 CQWW, both modes. I've been contesti; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-05/msg00018.html (8,677 bytes)
15. Kenwood East Coast Parts Phone#? (score: 1): Author: Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL (Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL); Date: Tue Jan 18 13:03:19 1994; Hey all. Anyone have the Kenwood E.Coast Parts Distributor's Phone#? 73,K2WK Sorry about the bandwidth consumed in wide distribution of a note I would like to go only to the Bay Area, but I don't hav; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-01/msg00059.html (19,995 bytes)
16. Kenwood E.Coast Parts# (score: 1): Author: Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL (Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL); Date: Wed Jan 19 14:40:58 1994; Yes, its 1-800-637-0388. FYI Tech info is 1-213-639-7140. Larry, K3TLX Just a reminder that this weekend is the ARRL January VHF Sweepstakes. Starts 1900 UTC Jan 22 and ends at 0400 UTC Jan 24. Club; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-01/msg00062.html (13,240 bytes)
17. Survey (score: 1): Author: Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL (Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL); Date: Tue Feb 1 09:10:42 1994; I remember quite vividly my 1st contest - field day 1966. I was a mere 12 years old and had a great time. I recall how the 80M op came running out of the tent screaming that he had just worked a "PA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-02/msg00002.html (12,355 bytes)
18. No subject (score: 1): Author: Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL (Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL); Date: Fri Mar 4 13:51:05 1994; K222222222222222K K K K GL K K & K K 73 K K K2WK K K K K !! GO FRC !! K K K KWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWK; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-03/msg00008.html (6,226 bytes)
19. QSL/QRZ (score: 1): Author: Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL (Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL); Date: Thu Mar 31 14:05:12 1994; Along these lines, I had always ASS_U_ME_D that was the requirement in all contests. Am I wrong? This past weekend I corrected numerous folks who repeated the serial number I gave them and, it was w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-03/msg00077.html (6,534 bytes)
20. Russian Contest Annoucement (score: 1): Author: Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL (Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL); Date: Sat Apr 16 01:37:40 1994; The Union of Radio Amateurs of Russia and its Contest Committee have the honor to invite all licensed Radio Amateurs around the world to take part in the first ever 'Russian DX Contes' which will tak; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-04/msg00036.html (9,860 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]