- 1. [RTTY] Re: [CQ-Contest] Morons at the NCJ (score: 1)
- Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
- Date: Mon Feb 11 12:17:45 2002
- Is there any chance that changing the title of this thread would help those that make the decisions even pay any attention to the valid concerns? ;-) -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00134.html (7,782 bytes)
- 2. Re: [WriteLog] More QTC Improvements (score: 1)
- Author: "WA9ALS - John" <wa9als@starband.net>
- Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 06:48:15 -0500
- European majority The idea of a box displaying the number of unsent QTCs sounds like a nice feature to me. Regarding the above though, what seems to happen in practice, especially S&P, is that the o
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00028.html (8,057 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu