CQ-Contest archive search

181. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs - Time for the next step? (score: 1)

Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>

Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:56:19 -0400

Pete, Without reopening the debates over LotW, this is not possible. When a station "signs" and uploads QSO data to LotW, that data is signed using the station's private key. By design, ARRL does not

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00232.html (13,136 bytes)

182. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs - Time for the next step? (score: 1)

Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>

Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:16:56 -0400

Not quite, the data in the LotW upload is not the same as that in the Cabrillo file required by the contest sponsor. tQSL extracts the necessary data (call, band/frequency/mode/start time) from the

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00247.html (14,037 bytes)

183. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs - Time for the next step? (score: 1)

Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>

Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:08:38 -0400

They certainly could do that. However the current data structure of LotW and most Cabrillo formats are significantly different. It would take major changes on both sides to make them compatible. Tha

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00248.html (18,063 bytes)

184. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs - Time for the next step? (score: 1)

Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>

Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:30:43 -0400

The proper question is why any contest sponsor should unilaterally take the unprecedented step of releasing all contest logs to public mischief? None of that justifies making logs public. It is up t

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00278.html (14,111 bytes)

185. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs - Time for the next step? (score: 1)

Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>

Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:50:44 -0400

Gerry, The Cabrillo header will also need to be removed. By the way, this would be a perfect solution for CQ as well ... convert all calls to random 9 digit sequence. Each log could be assigned the 9

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00301.html (17,183 bytes)

186. Re: [CQ-Contest] DX Doubler and contesting (score: 1)

Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>

Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:00:45 -0400

It will be just the switching core of MK2R/MK2R+ - it will not have any soundcard or soundcard interface. It will not contain any receive recording or digital receive ("line") switching and it will

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00310.html (15,410 bytes)

187. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW confirmation rates (score: 1)

Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>

Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:57:56 -0500

Someone needs to point out that the emperor [still] has no clothes. Rick, Bob and Dave have done a marvelous job rebooting Trusted QSL and expensive new hardware has restored the original rapid proce

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00136.html (11,538 bytes)