Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w2lc@twcny.rr.com: 47 ]

Total 47 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] QSO Parties (score: 1)
Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:55:54 -0400
QSO Parties I have been asked on several occasions to resurrect the New York QSO Party. Seems that there are a few people out there with good memories, that remember that the SUNY at Buffalo ARC spon
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00152.html (9,193 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Comment Summary (score: 1)
Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:19:05 -0400
Thank you to everyone who sent in comments, they were very good! 73 Scott W2LC W2LC@arrl.org QSO Party Comments & Suggestions Do not use CQP or PAQP weekend (I think thats a given) Fall is hunting se
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00391.html (9,196 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Comment Summary (score: 1)
Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:28:29 +0000
Thanks all, for the last few comments. And the correction about CQP not using CA counties for multipliers for in-state CA stations. With the high activity of that contest it makes sense. Gives those
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00404.html (8,303 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Directional CQs & Contest Ethics (score: 1)
Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:59:08 -0500
Directional CQs Way back when, in the days of paper logs, every once in awhile I did directional CQing for VE multipliers, MAR and NL or whatever the mults were many years ago. From here, you go to 8
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00189.html (8,400 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW? (score: 1)
Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:26:11 -0500
Rick, You make me laugh! Here is another good one for you. I received the following for the ARRL 160m contest: Now I'm not poking fun at the log checker, just stating the facts. -- You are receiving
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00293.html (10,568 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] Ill Host A Rookie, but . (score: 1)
Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:16:08 +0000
Ill Host A Rookie, but . I would be glad to host a rookie contester at my station, as modest as it is, but not too bad, 80ft tower, stacked yagis. Old TS-930. Okay they can bring their own radio if t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00211.html (9,220 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ill Host A Rookie, but . (score: 1)
Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:01:02 -0500
Tom, Tom, you big lid! Tom N2CU knows me all too well. I have a decent computer. I just got high speed internet access two years ago (cable), ahhh the good life. I'm at the end of the line here, one
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00223.html (9,130 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] public logs (there are no secrets) (score: 1)
Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:53:56 -0400
Well I don't agree that there are no secrets left, I have one. Probably won't help the top ten stations too much, but it could. The year I used my "secret" strategy, no one else was doing the same th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00252.html (10,374 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Frustration this weekend (score: 1)
Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:25:47 -0500
When S&Ping I often call before hearing a callsign, we all do that first time on a band, then hope they ID in a Q or two. I've done 100 per hour S&P, and the non-IDing station is a problem. A station
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00020.html (9,049 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] CQ Valencia Spain (score: 1)
Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 22:57:53 -0500
I am planning a trip to Valencia Spain this year, probably in May. I am looking for any tips on where to go and what to see, and any contest stations or clubs to visit. Also looking for a stable for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00119.html (6,648 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] Not a Serious Contester Definition (score: 1)
Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:56:27 -0500
Ken, Really? <<Ken Said: What serious competitor doesn't use computer logging? OK, This I have. I don't completely live in a cave <<Ken also said: What serious competitor doesn't have the computer tr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00116.html (8,833 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] What contributes to your score the most? (score: 1)
Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 14:43:23 -0500
Ken, Just to let you know I was not insulted at all. Everyone, Having an older radio is like living in a less than optimum location, you work with what you have. I see a lot of guys putting in some e
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00138.html (8,732 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] Inverse Distance Based Scoring Proposal (score: 1)
Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:58:39 -0400
Inverse distance based scoring If the ARRL DX contest changes, lets also change Sweepstakes as well, but to the opposite, inverse distance based scoring. Since W5, W6, W7, W4, W0, W9 all have the adv
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00179.html (7,989 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] DX Contest Handicap Proposal (score: 1)
Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:05:14 -0400
Read down a bit for the proposal. W8JI has it correct, propagation is much more important than distance. And George you are hilarious! Thanks. LU5DX said: FACT: Distance based scoring will also attra
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00287.html (10,753 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] No ID Equals a NIL (score: 1)
Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 22:14:58 -0500
Add this to the station that does not ID, how about the station not acknowledging the QSO? I was operating SS CW QRP and a midwest station never responded after I sent my information. When you are QR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00095.html (7,856 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] Incomplete SS exchange (score: 1)
Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:35:33 -0500
Well Joe.... I admit it, I recently changed my check in SS a few years ago. Why? My "real" check of 69 just doesn't get through on SSB, way too many repeats are asked for, so I decided to use another
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00229.html (8,022 bytes)

17. [CQ-Contest] Two points for intra-NA QSOs in CQWW? (score: 1)
Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 16:26:12 +0000
I dont agree with making logs public either Ron, not for any particular reason. In the end I send in my logs, and I dont really care that much. Yes, I have looked at other peoples logs myself, so som
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00266.html (8,766 bytes)

18. [CQ-Contest] KILLING THE GOLDEN GOOSE (score: 1)
Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:51:41 -0400
My longtime friend George said: Eliminating our category-of-choice seems a rather shabby reward for our trust and devotion over not just years, but decades. George Im 100% with you on this. Operating
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00381.html (9,828 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] I just will not send in logs (score: 1)
Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 12:06:42 -0400
Bob said: If anything, submit your log as a CHECKLOG as a protest. Bob, I have submitted a couple logs late, simply missing the deadline not as a protest, only to have the log rejected. So which cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00383.html (7,288 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] I just will not send in logs (score: 1)
Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:07:42 -0400
If I remember correctly it was a contest with a 5 day deadline, maybe the Sprint or NAQP ? It was Friday evening and I sent the log only to find out I missed the deadline by something like an hour or
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00400.html (8,749 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu