Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w1ebi@lightband.com: 52 ]

Total 52 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-857D for contesting??? (score: 1)
Author: "George Harlem W1EBI" <w1ebi@lightband.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:44:02 -0400
Congratulations on earning your General, Jacob! If you have done some VHF contesting in the past and want to try out your new band privileges in some HF contests, of course you can use the FT-857. Is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00573.html (8,634 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] AA log submission (score: 1)
Author: "George Harlem W1EBI" <w1ebi@lightband.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 12:54:46 -0400
The elog utility from JARL actually works FB to convert a Cabrillo log to the "Jabrillo" format. Of course, had they put a link to that page on the AA Contest site we could have saved numerous electr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00598.html (10,544 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-920 - IC-718 (score: 1)
Author: "George Harlem W1EBI" <w1ebi@lightband.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 08:18:16 -0400
I've used an FT-920 since returning to ham radio three years ago. With over 21K QSO's and a substantial portion of those DXing and contesting with a pair of Carolina Windoms, I consider the 920 the f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00903.html (9,796 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-857D for contesting??? (score: 1)
Author: "George Harlem W1EBI" <w1ebi@lightband.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:44:02 -0400
Congratulations on earning your General, Jacob! If you have done some VHF contesting in the past and want to try out your new band privileges in some HF contests, of course you can use the FT-857. Is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01162.html (8,634 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] AA log submission (score: 1)
Author: "George Harlem W1EBI" <w1ebi@lightband.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:42:34 -0400
The JARL log submission template is a unique non-Cabrillo format. If you read the instructions on the AA Contest website, you'll soon understand why few non-JA's bother to spend the time to create th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00303.html (10,627 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: [3830] 2005 NAQP CW - All Claimed Scores10Jan2005 (score: 1)
Author: "George Harlem W1EBI" <w1ebi@lightband.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:35:28 -0500
There is no high power category in NAQP. I totally screwed up by not remembering the rules and will be sending a checklog only. George W1EBI -- End of Original Message -- ____________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00152.html (8,877 bytes)

7. RE: [CQ-Contest] Sprint resources? (score: 1)
Author: "George Harlem W1EBI" <w1ebi@lightband.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:25:38 -0500
Ian, you could start with "The Sprint Survival Web Page" at: http://n6tr.jzap.com/sprint.html 73, George W1EBI --Original Message-- From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00297.html (8,226 bytes)

8. RE: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX in 1960 (score: 1)
Author: "George Harlem W1EBI" <w1ebi@lightband.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 00:11:03 -0500
Yep, those are the (CW) dates. Gosh, according to my log everyone sent actual RST reports back then. George W1EBI Phone was February 6th and 7th and March 5th and 6th. CW was February 20th and 21st a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00000.html (8,141 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Newly elected YCCC officers (score: 1)
Author: "George Harlem W1EBI" <w1ebi@lightband.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 19:10:18 -0400
On Saturday, April 9, the Yankee Clipper Contest Club held its annual election meeting. The following were elected to serve as officers for the April 2005-March 2006 club year: President: K1RX, Mark
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00264.html (7,158 bytes)

10. RE: [CQ-Contest] Why we should care (score: 1)
Author: "George Harlem W1EBI" <w1ebi@lightband.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 10:11:18 -0500
There was such a public outcry over a recent "wardrobe malfunction" on CBS that NBC chose to edit ER only four days later. I rarely get involved in mass controversies, but I've sent a note on this on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00159.html (9,353 bytes)

11. RE: [CQ-Contest] ARRL CW DX, J6DX Pwr?? (score: 1)
Author: "George Harlem W1EBI" <w1ebi@lightband.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 22:12:30 -0500
What you heard was "5NNNN" for 599 99. One guy sent sent "5nnnnn" for 599 99, another sent "5NN 73"--but who measures output power to that precision :-) George W1EBI --Original Message-- From: cq-con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00385.html (10,653 bytes)

12. RE: [CQ-Contest] ARRL CW DX, J6DX Pwr?? (score: 1)
Author: "George Harlem W1EBI" <w1ebi@lightband.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 11:00:29 -0500
In retrospect, I was out of line with my reply to the original email. Yes, the contest was over but not the log deadline. I was guilty myself two years ago in asking a similar type of question and go
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00399.html (10,725 bytes)

13. RE: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Phone - 40 m lack of bandplan compliance (score: 1)
Author: "George Harlem W1EBI" <w1ebi@lightband.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 23:14:11 -0500
(snip) Besides, now that CW has been dropped from most jurisdictions, I would expect CW allocations to gradually disappear. (snip) David, I sincerely hope your expectations do not ever materialize. C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00099.html (9,458 bytes)

14. RE: [CQ-Contest] Article on BPL (score: 1)
Author: "George Harlem W1EBI" <w1ebi@lightband.com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 00:33:59 -0400
Tom Lewis wrote a terrific book in 1991, "Empire of the Air--The Men Who Made Radio." It was made into a special on PBS a few years ago. One paragraph particularly struck me: "Despite Edwin Howard Ar
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00322.html (8,944 bytes)

15. RE: [CQ-Contest] CW speed training software for Windows (XP)? (score: 1)
Author: "George Harlem W1EBI" <w1ebi@lightband.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 00:30:33 -0400
Rin, this is a very neat application! I only tried it for a few minutes, but it is very realistic. Especially at this early hour after trying to hear weak signals in AACW for a few hours :-) A "virtu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-06/msg00232.html (10,776 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] All Asian CW (score: 1)
Author: "George Harlem W1EBI" <w1ebi@lightband.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:24:28 -0400
According to 3830 there are lots of non-Asian scores being submitted in LP category. If I read the rules correctly, only Asian stations compete as both LP and HP entries. Non-Asian stations enter as
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-06/msg00263.html (7,024 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Advice about HF amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: "George Harlem W1EBI" <w1ebi@lightband.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2004 09:11:36 -0400
You'll get every Z-based amp in response to this! The Kenwood TL-922 meets all your criteria. It's built like a brick outhouse and has great cooling. Without QSK, though, it's not every op's contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00028.html (9,346 bytes)

18. RE: [CQ-Contest] Another gratuitous SS-CW trick (score: 1)
Author: "George Harlem W1EBI" <w1ebi@lightband.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 23:40:42 -0500
Baloney. Once the contest starts there is NO guarantee that any station will come back to you even if you have a "warmup" QSO and get a "S9+20" report. Pre-contesting warmup is NOT contesting. It's n
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00341.html (11,508 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] Re: [YCCC] Re: SS-CW Tricks et al. (score: 1)
Author: "George Harlem W1EBI" <w1ebi@lightband.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:12:46 -0500
Take any set of a few thousand individuals and, regrettably, there is bound to be a cheat or two among them. I got flamed by a guy who really (and profanely) disagreed with my suggestion that pre-con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00467.html (10,770 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Any country file mismatches this weekend? (score: 1)
Author: "George Harlem W1EBI" <w1ebi@lightband.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:29:15 -0500
VK0DX came up as Macquarie instead of KC4. Didn't check 3D2XA, but I think it was correct as Fiji and not Rotuma. George W1EBI -- End of Original Message -- __________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00806.html (9,080 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu