Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:theroadtrip@mts.net: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sprint and Different names (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <theroadtrip@mts.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:04:43 -0500
You know, I think the person who chastised the "get a life" comment may have been acting in kindness to a gentleman that has earned our respect, but... Even at 85, there is such a thing as being over
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00383.html (10,324 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is holding QRG's legal? (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <theroadtrip@mts.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:57:39 -0600
I have to admit I'm on the fence on this one. If it was a pre-arranged attempt to monopolize frequencies, then it raises an eyebrow. If, as it seems from the description, two guys who just happened t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00481.html (10,460 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] RAC Contest (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <theroadtrip@mts.net>
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2009 08:44:27 -0600
Hi Scott, Contest Period: 0000 UTC to 2359 UTC December 19, 2009. By my calculation, that's a Saturday (UTC), or 6 p.m. Friday to 5:59 p.m. Saturday (CST). 73, kelly ve4xt ___________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00168.html (9,284 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules? (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <theroadtrip@mts.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 07:37:53 -0600
Marty, I think you may be getting a little overly ad hominem in your debating style here. Dave has never said his concerns are about guaranteeing a win. He has never said his concerns are ONLY about
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00228.html (25,541 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW? (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <theroadtrip@mts.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 08:39:03 -0600
I'm with Lindquist on this one: ham radio contests aren't typing class. Never were, never should be. As long as it's an honest typo, where it's clear that the operator did indeed copy correctly but m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00165.html (11,929 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW? (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <theroadtrip@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 22:16:08 -0600
And of course, that raises another question: If writing the rules will take a team of lawyers, then each of us will have to consult with our $300-per-hour legal beagles to understand them. Is that th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00205.html (9,549 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut Number "J" - ASSISTED or MULTI? (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <theroadtrip@mts.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:02:03 -0600
Are we really going to the place where asking for clarification on generic operating issues counts as assistance? I am sure the station that sent JTT for 100 isn't unique, so asking "what does J mean
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00241.html (10,878 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <theroadtrip@mts.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 01:56:32 -0500
It seems as though this conversation centres a lot around the question of progress. Is it the role of amateur radio to stand by and let the world advance around it? I would say no, and I'm sure that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00214.html (10,250 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <theroadtrip@mts.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 11:12:27 -0500
W9SZ opined: Fun should be the ONLY reason for contesting. 73, kelly ve4xt _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00223.html (9,723 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] K3TUP Project Vote (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <theroadtrip@mts.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:57:45 -0500
K3TUP's project is now ranked No.1! _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00377.html (10,260 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <theroadtrip@mts.net>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 21:24:24 -0500
There was a contest just like this. Might still be there, too: the Classic Radio Exchange. I know you got significant bonus points for using a classic (>25 years) radio, and there might have been bon
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-05/msg00251.html (8,130 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of CW decoders in contests - a contrarian opinion (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <theroadtrip@mts.net>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 20:48:59 -0500
Hi Brett, I'd like to see an example of where or how one of us will be harmed by a QSO with an operator using a decoder. Is it "I had to learn the code, dammit, so everybody else must too"? I can't i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00002.html (12,610 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Field Day (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <theroadtrip@mts.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 08:51:04 -0500
While the advice from John is good, I think it's also reasonable to think that Joe knew what he was asking about. That said, I do remember the last FD operation I was at (other than my own solo 1D ef
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00158.html (13,122 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] List of WRTC stations / Results /Overspotting, and its impact (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <theroadtrip@mts.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 09:39:23 -0500
Paul's right: giving everybody fair playing conditions isn't the same as rendering everyone equal. Is it not possible, just thinking out loud here, to request the DX Cluster operators to kindly emplo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00253.html (12,635 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spots and Success in the WRTC - a little data for discussion (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <theroadtrip@mts.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:47:35 -0500
I just find it really interesting, in the face of the relentless march of technology, that the station with the MOST spots did not win and that the station with no spots at all placed sixth. Be inter
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00348.html (14,473 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Meaning of Assisted (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <theroadtrip@mts.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:16:14 -0500
This isn't directed at any one individual, irrespective of my choosing one peron's post to do "reply all" to, so Joe, this isn't directed AT you personally, 'kay? Whatever happened to the idea of eng
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-09/msg00193.html (15,635 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <theroadtrip@mts.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 09:31:54 -0500
Hi all, May I respectfully suggest checking the archives on this one? Zack is right: even as quoted by Nate, the rule doesn't even specify amateur licence. However, if you check the archives, the rul
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00134.html (11,873 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Omitting callsigns in echanges (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <theroadtrip@mts.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 08:16:08 -0500
Hi all, The ARRL has weighed in previously on this debate as well. According to the rules, the exchange consists of five parts: 1. Serial no. 2. Precedence 3. Sending station's callsign 4. Check 5. A
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00163.html (10,239 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <theroadtrip@mts.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:24:44 -0500
The ARRL recognizes its rule is ambiguous but also recognizes that it simply doesn't matter. It matters not one whit if the check is legitimate or made up: unlike a radiogram, an exchange is not abou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00186.html (16,766 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Disruption of Emergency Communication during CQWW - a suggestion (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <theroadtrip@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 13:57:52 -0500
I like the intention, but I think we all know there are enough people out there who don't exactly engage brain when shifting into grab-a-spot mode that you'd end up with a bunch of people calling on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00234.html (11,087 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu