Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:steve@rjtraining.fsnet.co.uk: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Good Bye 2 Anglesey GB2ANG active for next 12 days -probably off topic but possibly of interest (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Jones" <steve@rjtraining.fsnet.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 21:41:20 -0000
Hi All Just had verbal confirmation that the Dragon ARC, Isle of Anglesey, Wales have been issued with GB2ANG sp call to mark the end of Anglesey Islands status as IOTA EU124. Sadly the Islands statu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00255.html (8,757 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] RE: [UK-CONTEST] FT1000 or FT1000MP? (LONG) - SUMMARY/DECISION (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Jones" <steve@rjtraining.fsnet.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 22:34:54 -0000
Happy New Year to all, and thanks to all your helpful replies to my original questions. Here is a shortish summary of what I got / have concluded: A number of people replying advised me to keep the f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00039.html (13,634 bytes)

3. RE: [CQ-Contest] CQWW question (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Jones" <steve@rjtraining.fsnet.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 21:31:25 +0100
Oh dear, I guess the usa stations I have worked earlier this year on 60m were not legal then? :-) My special licence permit refers to it being granted for experimenting in near inter uk near vertical
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00067.html (9,688 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] FT1000 or FT1000MP? (LONG) (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Jones" <steve@rjtraining.fsnet.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 11:59:37 -0000
Seasons greetings to all. I would appreciate people's view as to whether I should keep my 2 year old FT1000 (non D) radio, or the mint condition FT1000MP which I bought in December. I bought the latt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00474.html (11,745 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] RE: [UK-CONTEST] FT1000 or FT1000MP? (LONG) (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Jones" <steve@rjtraining.fsnet.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:56:04 -0000
Andy, My replies to you direct keep bouncing for some reason. Thanks to everyone for the replies to my questions re ft1000 etc to date. I will respond direct and post summary after a few days. 73 Ste
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00488.html (13,827 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] thank you cq (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Jones" <steve@rjtraining.fsnet.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 23:43:41 +0100
Looks like my mail is working too now - cqww cw 2003 certificate arrived this morning here. 73 Steve GW0GEI --Original Message-- From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00485.html (8,352 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu