Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:stan@aqity.com: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] self help during contest (score: 1)
Author: "Stan Stockton" <stan@aqity.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 12:49:10 -0600
Clearly this discussion has to do more with single operator stations than multi. You could have a dozen operators listening to the frequency verifying information with no thought of cheating. However
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00256.html (12,447 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Morse Code on Google (score: 1)
Author: "Stan Stockton" <stan@aqity.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:01:51 -0500
I'm declaring Samuel Morse Birthday as a National Holiday. Everyone take off the rest of the day with pay. :-) Stan, K5GO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00357.html (7,555 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] 4-square dump power into horizontal dipole (score: 1)
Author: "Stan Stockton" <stan@aqity.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:44:16 -0500
Here we go....Or use the dump power to drive another amplifier - as long as you stay under 1500W total :-) Stan, K5GO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00386.html (8,358 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Inspections (score: 1)
Author: "Stan Stockton" <stan@aqity.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:10:00 -0500
This is what I read in the rules. Did I miss something? "8. A competitor who wishes to be judged for a top score in their category must agree to a potential visitation at any time during the contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00186.html (10,426 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Kids, contesting, and ham radio (score: 1)
Author: "Stan Stockton" <stan@aqity.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:23:56 -0500
I think the best way to get someone interested in this sport is to get them to participate as opposed to trying to explain it and compare it to some other sport, perhaps with future disappointment wh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00445.html (8,843 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi-op rule change in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "Stan Stockton" <stan@aqity.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:53:49 -0500
Looks to me like they are defining alternate CQs as "soliciting contacts" Juha OH6XX I can see where it could become a bit messy if several multi-multi stations had 3-6 stations on the air, all soli
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-08/msg00145.html (9,823 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu