Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:rx99tx@gmail.com: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules? (score: 1)
Author: Art RX9TX <rx99tx@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:47:57 +0500
The idea has been sounded many times, ONLY the QSO points system based on distance can more or less be considered as "fair". But even in this case, the DX locations will EVER have advantage over tho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00264.html (11,027 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW contest analysis database (score: 1)
Author: Art RX9TX <rx99tx@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 19:18:56 +0500
Good work Fab, JAs, PYs and VKs would be happy with the new scoring system :) -- RX9TX http://rx9tx.qrz.ru "Do, or do not. There is no 'try'." [Yoda, The Empire Strikes Back] ________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00319.html (11,135 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC 24 hours M/M (score: 1)
Author: Art RX9TX <rx99tx@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 18:30:36 +0600
Hello, Wonder why people can not just treat the rule as a part of a game? At the same time they understand that everyone is affected equally and the winners list will be just the same with or without
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00065.html (8,599 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC (score: 1)
Author: Art RX9TX <rx99tx@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 07:17:04 +0600
Just a matter of time, Edward :) Comparing RDXC and the contests you mention, the RDXC sponsors receive as many logs as WPX and significally more than ARRL DX. -- RX9TX http://rx9tx.qrz.ru "Enjoy you
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00073.html (7,669 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] : RE: RDXC (score: 1)
Author: RX9TX <rx99tx@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 11:30:41 +0600
RDXC2010 RU1a 4700 QSO. Multiply it by 2.. Wish we had the same number of contesters in Russia. Number of received logs is just one measure of popularity. Another measure is the number of QSOs made b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00078.html (9,203 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC (score: 1)
Author: Art RX9TX <rx99tx@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 18:27:39 +0600
RD> Thats not correct. ARRL DX received 5800 logs in 2009 versus 3506 for Rich, this is not quite fair :) You sum the SSB and CW logs, can I then multiply 3629 (not 3506) 4 times taking the contest l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00082.html (7,838 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC 24 hours M/M (score: 1)
Author: Art RX9TX <rx99tx@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 23:57:18 +0600
Bet they just based on QSO definition which means 2-way (2-way!) communication. If any bit of the exchange is busted then the integrity of entire QSO is questioned. -- RX9TX http://rx9tx.qrz.ru "Yiel
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00091.html (8,894 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] LotW after ARRL DX (score: 1)
Author: Art RX9TX <rx99tx@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 17:28:23 +0600
Hello Helmut, My ARRL DX CW (~170 QSO only) LoTW confirmation rate is about 52%. RX9TX -- RX9TX http://rx9tx.qrz.ru "I generally avoid temptation unless I can't resist it." [Mae West] _______________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-05/msg00033.html (8,069 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] fun stuff :) (score: 1)
Author: Art R8TX <rx99tx@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 23:16:18 +0600
Hello , Watch the RZ9UMA WPX CW video :) http://dx-world.net/ -- R8TX http://r8tx.qrz.ru "Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter." (Martin Luther King) _____________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00012.html (7,243 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Congrats to Russian DX Contest cracking downcheating (score: 1)
Author: Art R8TX <rx99tx@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:41:40 +0500
Too much for what? I really doubt you can name a couple of calls who can pretend for top-three scores and whose stations do lack rig control. -- R8TX (ex RX9TX) http://r8tx.qrz.ru "I love those who y
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00133.html (10,830 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC-2014 event scores for Russian DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: Art R8TX <rx99tx@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:46:45 +0500
Then if the "top 3 rule" is not about you what all of the noise is about? The top 3 conteders take it very seriously. Here's WC1M's quote on DXCC and strictness of LOTW registration, IMO it fits perf
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00154.html (10,133 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Throwing the Baby Out With the Bathwater (score: 1)
Author: Art R8TX <rx99tx@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 23:45:43 +0500
wjc> all this discussion about rules makes me want to compete, if you could Mike, just curious, in what category are you going to win? -- R8TX (ex RX9TX) http://r8tx.qrz.ru "No one can make you feel
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00166.html (8,007 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Throwing the Baby Out With the Bathwater (score: 1)
Author: Art R8TX <rx99tx@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 07:07:37 +0500
I can not undrstand how on earth the new rules "make the participation harder" for W7DNA or K0HB or you? R8TX MFW> By making it harder for people to participate....participation will be -- R8TX (ex R
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00170.html (11,257 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] ARRL news (score: 1)
Author: Art R8TX <rx99tx@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:09:26 +0600
Hello , http://www.arrl.org/news/new-russian-prefix-system-in-use Who on earth R5AA is to move the WAC continent boudaries? He is not even the SRR president and ARRL should be more cautious relying o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00026.html (6,955 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] IOTA Contest Results (score: 1)
Author: Art R8TX <rx99tx@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 12:38:58 +0600
The IOTA News page would be the proper place to put this on :) -- R8TX (ex RX9TX) http://r8tx.qrz.ru _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-01/msg00013.html (7,337 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu