- 1. [CQ-Contest] WPX- RIP (score: 1)
- Author: robert@gi0kow.freeserve.co.uk (Robert Cummings)
- Date: Mon Mar 1 22:45:33 1999
- Congratulations Steve, Judging by the amount of e-mails I have received today agreeing with my comments I guess your one of the lucky ones. 73 - -- Robert Cummings GI0KOW -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http:/
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00009.html (7,433 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] WPX- EU qso party? (score: 1)
- Author: robert@gi0kow.freeserve.co.uk (Robert Cummings)
- Date: Wed Mar 3 02:05:50 1999
- Hi Group, I read Mike NO6X posting tonight regarding his experiences operating from Macedonia last year in WPX ssb. I note his comment "wanna talk about a qso party???" His comment set me thinking so
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00019.html (8,029 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] WPX- EU qso party? (score: 1)
- Author: robert@gi0kow.freeserve.co.uk (Robert Cummings)
- Date: Wed Mar 3 18:58:22 1999
- The only point of the post was to highlight the fact that WPX under the old rules was anything but an EU qso party which had been suggested earlier. I just thought it was interesting how close the ov
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00030.html (7,562 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu