- 1. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10M Published Results (score: 1)
- Author: rfpwr@linknet.net (Chas)
- Date: Sun Jun 14 09:00:29 1998
- The rumors of my retirement from radio are premature. Just been too busy to operate or post to the reflector. I still read the reflector periodically, to keep up with the goings on. My last activity
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-06/msg00065.html (8,296 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] SIGNING CALLS (score: 1)
- Author: rfpwr@linknet.net (rfpwr@linknet.net)
- Date: Wed Jul 22 09:38:37 1998
- I agree with Dick, N6AA that there are times, under some conditions, where one might not send your callsign after every exchange. This would depend on the operator and the nature of the pileup. I kno
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00186.html (8,423 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] Unruly European Pileups/CQ WW Scoring (score: 1)
- Author: rfpwr@linknet.net (rfpwr@linknet.net)
- Date: Fri Jul 31 10:09:36 1998
- I wish I had more of those unruly Eu pileups to contend with from LA. Amen to ZD8Z's CQ WW scoring change test. 73, Chas N8RR -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrati
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00276.html (6,476 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] QSL Bureau Fee Structure (score: 1)
- Author: rfpwr@linknet.net (rfpwr@linknet.net)
- Date: Wed Aug 12 16:02:08 1998
- When I lived in WV (most of my life) DX stations I worked in CQWW would many times question me when I sent Zone 5. They wanted to place me in Zone 4. This was before computer logging. As a fairly ac
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00202.html (9,712 bytes)
- 5. [CQ-Contest] WPX 0-point discussion (score: 1)
- Author: rfpwr@linknet.net (Charles Young)
- Date: Sat Apr 12 15:07:45 1997
- rule. Having not read my mail in a while, this discussion may already be old. However, my thoughts on WPX are: 1. The contest is boring unless you are on the east coast and can run DX . 2. The probl
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00154.html (11,066 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu