Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n9rvee@gmail.com: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] New RTTY Contesting Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Barkey" <n9rvee@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:33:26 -0600
Don, This survey does not give respondents any opportunity to voice what are clearly the large concerns about RTTY contesting/CW contesting conflicts, especially on 40 meters. Most US/VE domestic CW
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00250.html (8,729 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] 7QP - Identifying in the contest when you don'thave a7-land call? (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Barkey" <n9rvee@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 14:39:43 -0600
COQP with K8FC/FRE or K8FC/CUS Perhaps the folks who go mobile in QSO parties could comment, but I have always signed plain old N9RV from Montana because I have thought that LOTW would require a sep
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00126.html (7,700 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Improving contesting (was Extreme) (score: 1)
Author: Patrick Barkey <n9rvee@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:41:57 -0600
There's no automatic formula. Good writeups communicate enthusiasm and a sense of the fun of the contest. In a major contest, tens of thousands of people set life aside to get on their radios, and t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00281.html (8,994 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CD Parties (score: 1)
Author: Patrick Barkey <n9rvee@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:13:48 -0600
If you recall, in the summer of 1976 the Open CD party which would have been held in July was replaced by the one-time-only bicentennial contest, and after that the CD parties were kaput. I've always
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00062.html (7,832 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Leveling the playing field (score: 1)
Author: Patrick Barkey <n9rvee@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:12:17 -0600
This is an interesting discussion. Even if it does come up all the time -- it is very central to what motivates many of us as contesters. I used to be a lot more rabid about this in my youth. In the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00151.html (10,047 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] PSE QSY - Deer in headlights (score: 1)
Author: Patrick Barkey <n9rvee@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 15:00:17 -0700
George, I was asked to QSY quite a bit in the ARRL CW. I am happy to comply but: 1. Often times I couldn't react at all simply because I was running a very fast rate on the other radio. No time to sa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00592.html (9,116 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fwd: NILs hurt (score: 1)
Author: Patrick Barkey <n9rvee@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 10:06:01 -0600
contest, I DELETE the ENTRY in my logging program. This begs the question -- at what point in a QSO do we cease requiring confirmations? In other words, if you need to copy a confirmation to log a Q
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-09/msg00025.html (7,756 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] CW Sprint is Here (score: 1)
Author: Patrick Barkey <n9rvee@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 20:10:56 -0700
Set your calendars for the most intense 4 hours in contesting. The CW Sprint is here. Starts at 0000z Sunday (Saturday night local time in NA). Rules are here: http://ncjweb.com/Sprint-Rules.pdf Look
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-02/msg00047.html (7,179 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] NCJ (score: 1)
Author: Patrick Barkey <n9rvee@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 08:44:19 -0600
Yes, we had a printing glitch that affected an unknown number of Nov/Dec issues. If you are one of the unlucky ones, an email to circulation@arrl.org will get a new copy headed your way. Sorry about
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00095.html (7,155 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu