- 1. [CQ-Contest] KP2MM Disqualified in ARRL CW 2012 (score: 1)
- Author: yuriy rakushchynets <n2tta@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
- Hello to all I was operate in ARRL CW using KP2MM (club call) trustee KV4FZ. I have General class licence. And Kutzko KX9X told me: Yuri You were disqualified from the 2012 ARRL DX CW Contest for
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00215.html (8,903 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] KP2MM Disqualified in ARRL CW 2012 (score: 1)
- Author: yuriy rakushchynets <n2tta@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 19:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
- Thanks to all who replied to me, i have answer and nothing can change, and the discus to finish. I will try to pass extra class test before IARU See you in IARU contest. yuri N2TTA I'm not sure, but
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00285.html (11,591 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Two points for intra-NA QSOs in CQWW? (score: 1)
- Author: Yuriy Rakushchynets <n2tta@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 16:13:57 -0800 (PST)
- because is DX contest, for me it means no qso with own country -Regards Yuri N2TTA ________________________________ From: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com> To: 'cq-contest reflector' <cq-contest@con
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00193.html (10,572 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened (score: 1)
- Author: Yuriy Rakushchynets <n2tta@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:39:43 -0800 (PST)
- Each operator us own style running CQ, and is bad idea to force to mandatory ID after 3 qso. Whats will be next? no more than 2 QSO when you S&P No more 200qso per hour? Common folks, don't want to w
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-01/msg00179.html (10,054 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu