CQ-Contest archive search

1. [CQ-Contest] RIT offset as QRM clue (score: 1)

Author: n2mg@eham.net (Michael Gilmer)

Date: Sun Sep 1 22:23:03 2002

I would say that they simply zero beat poorly. If you are running at a good rate, I wouldn't move to accomodate the callers. They seem to be calling just fine, no? Mike N2MG

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-09/msg00015.html (7,947 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Contesting.com ? (score: 1)

Author: n2mg@eham.net (Mike Gilmer, N2MG)

Date: Mon Sep 16 08:24:55 2002

Seems we got hacked. Data has been restored to new server and we're back on the 'net. Mike N2MG webmaster@eham.net

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-09/msg00142.html (6,450 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] 2002 ARRL DX Phone Results Available (score: 1)

Author: n2mg@eham.net (Mike Gilmer, N2MG)

Date: Thu Sep 26 12:12:44 2002

And now that they need not buy QST, they get the results free! Mike N2MG

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-09/msg00208.html (8,359 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] 2002 ARRL DX Phone Results Available (score: 1)

Author: n2mg@eham.net (Mike Gilmer, N2MG)

Date: Thu Sep 26 14:30:43 2002

Even when line-scores disappear from QST, you can (or I will, anyway) bet the full results (line-scores and all) will appear on the web at roughly the same time as they would have appeared in QST in

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-09/msg00215.html (9,619 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] ARRL Discrimination (score: 1)

Author: n2mg@eham.net (Mike Gilmer, N2MG)

Date: Thu Sep 26 16:29:27 2002

"Discriminating against..." So we have a victim and an oppressor here, eh? FWIW, non-members can earn and receive certificates (and DX can earn certificates of participation) without cost or obligati

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-09/msg00224.html (7,086 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] 2002 ARRL DX CW Results (score: 1)

Author: n2mg@eham.net (Mike Gilmer, N2MG)

Date: Fri Sep 27 10:46:26 2002

Yesterday, the link to this PDF seemed to be missing (and the document itself probably as well). Perhaps it hid under a rock, scared of all the reflector chatter. ;-) It seems to be there now. Try ag

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-09/msg00242.html (7,259 bytes)

7. RE: [CQ-Contest] Sprint Alternatives (score: 1)

Author: "Mike Gilmer, N2MG" <n2mg@eham.net>

Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 06:09:08 -0500

Pul-lease - let's not go there, literally. Mike N2MG _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00189.html (7,613 bytes)

8. RE: [CQ-Contest] Feb 04 QST op-ed article (score: 1)

Author: "Mike Gilmer" <n2mg@eham.net>

Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 13:57:39 -0500

I'm not sure what the "standard responses" are; certainly there are "standard" complaints to which, eventually, will come standard responses. Contest-free zones certainly qualify as a "standard" desi

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00242.html (12,733 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Sharing Radio Spectrum and Roads (score: 1)

Author: "Mike Gilmer" <n2mg@eham.net>

Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 11:08:54 -0500

I also see the similarity between theses two resources, bands and roads, however, I see it somewhat differently: no race cars necessary. I liken the bands to the highways, normally filled, to various

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00265.html (10,077 bytes)

10. RE: [CQ-Contest] Sharing Radio Spectrum and Roads (score: 1)

Author: "Mike Gilmer" <n2mg@eham.net>

Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 15:13:38 -0500

Commuters (rush hour operators) are not summarily banned from these. Mike N2MG -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00285.html (8,656 bytes)

11. RE: [CQ-Contest] Feb 04 QST op-ed article (score: 1)

Author: "Mike Gilmer" <n2mg@eham.net>

Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 18:41:36 -0500

OP-ED, page 98 of Feb 2004 QST: "Finding a Place to Operate Phone on a Contest Weekend" by NF5B, Richard Webb elspider@bellsouth.net -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICI

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00332.html (10,213 bytes)

12. RE: [CQ-Contest] Airport security and ham gear - yesterday (score: 1)

Author: "Mike Gilmer" <n2mg@eham.net>

Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 19:56:14 -0500

Scott makes a good point. The guys X-raying you and your carry-ons do so under your supervision. If they find something anomalous, they can ask you about it. (I wonder what the TSA wonks do if they f

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00056.html (9,729 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] Contest cheats... (score: 1)

Author: "Mike Gilmer" <n2mg@eham.net>

Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 19:06:28 -0500

Sure there are those who cheat with packet, just like there are those who cheat by using 500W in low-power, or running 8KW in high-power, and I'm sure there are even those who use more than a triban

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00022.html (10,512 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] This is NOT Physical conditioning and contesting (score: 1)

Author: "Mike Gilmer, N2MG" <n2mg@eham.net>

Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 20:18:08 -0500

Guys, no offense, but can we please change the subject line of these emails? It hasn't been contesting or "Physical conditioning" in about four "overs"... Thanks Mike N2MG --Original Message-- I thin

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00286.html (9,301 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] IARU HF line scores in QST, not. (score: 1)

Author: n2mg@eham.net (Mike Gilmer, N2MG)

Date: Fri Jan 10 11:22:16 2003

2002 IARU is the 9th contest listed under "2002 Contest Results" 73 Mike N2MG The following message was sent by VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk> on Fri, 10 Jan 2003 03:23:16 +0000.

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00085.html (8,683 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] TS-950SD Rvcr Problems (score: 1)

Author: n2mg@eham.net (Mike Gilmer, N2MG)

Date: Fri Jan 10 11:29:18 2003

Better to ask this on the proper reflector - the Kenwood one on qth.net is pretty active: http://mailman.qth.net View older archives in the left menu area, or click "Directory of lists..." in the cen

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00087.html (7,948 bytes)

17. [CQ-Contest] Going Over to the Dark Side (score: 1)

Author: n2mg@eham.net (Mike Gilmer, N2MG)

Date: Mon Jan 13 12:41:26 2003

Perhaps a kind of "last-minute, as-the-contest-ends, make-one-more-QSO" rush overwhelmed their sensibilities. Unfortunately, folks form opinions about contesters/Contesting in general based on one (o

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00117.html (9,247 bytes)

18. [CQ-Contest] Again? (score: 1)

Author: n2mg@eham.net (Mike Gilmer, N2MG)

Date: Fri Jan 24 19:24:01 2003

I don't believe the octopus had anything to do with single-op. It had to do with multi-singles... There is STILL no rule against multiple tx in a single-op. Mike N2MG

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00308.html (7,300 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] So2R (score: 1)

Author: n2mg@eham.net (Mike Gilmer, N2MG)

Date: Sat Jan 25 12:17:49 2003

High-power operating is basically a bolt-on advantage, requiring little further investment in operating technique. Packet allows operators to take advantage of the efforts of hundreds of other operat

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00330.html (9,065 bytes)

20. [CQ-Contest] STUFF (score: 1)

Author: n2mg@eham.net (Mike Gilmer, N2MG)

Date: Sat Jan 25 16:28:52 2003

I disagree. I've done multi-ops and an occasional assisted operation in the past, and it's no cakewalk to try to work that spoonfed list of DX stations that hundreds are already calling. While operat

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00345.html (7,601 bytes)