Go to the article http://www.computerworld.com/governmenttopics/government/policy/story/0,10801,88829,00.html and click the "Send feedback" link at the bottom. That will get you to the editor. Accord
Is WCCC really the Why-Triple-C? ;-) -Mike N2MG ... I didn't have the original text file easily available, but here is the 1994 NCJ piece, converted to a .jpg file: http://mysite.verizon.net/vze2g8kb
Certainly with the elimination of line scores, QST has the room for something like this... Not so long ago, Ward, N0AX penned a brief "How to" on this very subject for eHam. http://www.eham.net/artic
Transportation Security Administration (part of the Homeland Security Department) In the context of this thread, they are the group that oversees/employs airport security/baggage screeners. Mike N2M
Here's one I saw today: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3076116791 It is listed as a "palomar amp not for cb" However, from the text in the ad: "i bought it was going to put up a b
In case there was any doubt, I reported all 3 devices through eBay's online system for doing just that. It was a bit convoluted to get to, but I found it. I clicked "Help" in their top menu, then "Co
Yes, that's it. It used to be a ten-minute band-change rule, but I like the 6-changes-per-hour rule better. The "second" and any other radios are good as back-ups and for filling the bandmap. Not lik
Looks like the web site has been updated. All the links seem to work now. Mike N2MG <snip> _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lis
Well I'll be dipped... The left menu on the site works, and various other things, but like everyone's said, not the stuff on the Downloads page... <oof> Mike N2MG ____________________________________
Bill Fisher suggested to me once that a blast of dits from your paddle will get most folks' attention. Seems to work fairly well if you're quick enough. Mike N2MG ____________________________________
<< Z= Zeroed-out-contact. This contact was essentially removed from your log, just as if it had never occurred. No penalties are imposed. The Z applies to contacts adjudicated to be with pirates or
I shopped for such a printer several months ago - it seemed that (nearly?) all the color inkjets had an adjustable feed tray that could be cranked down to take index cards. The one caveat is that the
I'm not sure if this was an attempt to lump the removal of uniques in with log checking in general... To me there's a big difference. Most log checking that I have "endured" assumes one is innocent (
Maybe I've been asleep, but I just noticed that the contesting.com mail-lists/reflectors have undergone some recent work. There's a new look to the archives and a search tool that now searches indivi
Well, I sure don't think the ARRL is going to "get rich" off the fees, and I would never fault them for trying to generate income. But if I did expect payment, what would it amount to? A penny or two
I have to explain this to eHam users on a regular basis. Without first snail mailing each new user using his FCC address to verify the individual (which we obviously do not do), we have no way to kno
The YCCC implores its members operating part-time from a MM who goes home during the contest, to get on the air from home and submit a log. This has had the approval of the CQWW folks for years. 73 M
Why is maintaining the "sense" of this thread so difficult? Here is what I was trying to say, in direct response to the original thread... ++++++++++++++ If N2MG operates at KC1XX M/M during 2003 CQW
I'm no DXCC expert, but as far as the DXCC goes... << 9. All stations must be contacted from the same DXCC Entity. So Joe Ham would have to get his JA/HL buddy to use Joe Ham's call and not sign it p
++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++ True in ARRL Not true in CQWW CQWW apparently allows me, as in this example, to use N2MG while at KC1XX as long as I do so in a way that does NOT help KC1XX's operation: