Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n2icarrl@gmail.com: 538 ]

Total 538 documents matching your query.

221. Re: [CQ-Contest] [N1MM] New RAC (ARRL contest) sections (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 10:39:07 -0600
So, let me get this straight.... RAC splits Ontario into 4 sections, but won't use those sections in RAC contests. ARRL (which is independent from RAC) does use those new sections in ARRL contests. S
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00068.html (8,686 bytes)

222. Re: [CQ-Contest] [N1MM] New RAC (ARRL contest) sections (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 21:04:21 -0600
That would be nice if it was true. However, as shown in http://www.rac.ca/en/rac/public-service/section-managers/ Yukon is not a RAC section. It is part of the British Columbia section. Yet the ARRL
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00076.html (8,534 bytes)

223. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fwd: New RAC (ARRL contest) sections (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 07:41:27 -0600
That's a rather remarkable result, Rich. We must not have been working the same contest. I went through my 2011 CW SS log. Having won the contest, and being located in a favorable location for workin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00104.html (13,825 bytes)

224. Re: [CQ-Contest] A little section history (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 14:00:27 -0600
478 Sweeps ! That is a remarkable number. Consider, that in 1979, there were no packet clusters, no assisted/unlimited class and only a few did single-op SO2R. 73, Steve, N2IC _______________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00115.html (8,673 bytes)

225. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Category Weighting Factor (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:24:05 -0600
You might have better luck if you posted to the WRTC-2014 reflector. See http://www.wrtc2014.org/contact-info/e-mail-list/ for info on subscribing. 73, Steve, N2IC ___________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00258.html (8,882 bytes)

226. Re: [CQ-Contest] Split operation in CQ WW CW (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 13:05:49 -0600
"We" have the tools ? Who is this "we" ? You mean, those who operate in the multi-op or single-op assisted categories that have DX spotting and Skimmer access, right ? For the rest of us traditionali
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00353.html (9,987 bytes)

227. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW split etc (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:01:49 -0600
So, let's say it's a multi-single but they are using many radios and many operators, but staying within the rules by using a transmitter interlock and not breaking the 10 minute or band-change-per-ho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00375.html (8,283 bytes)

228. Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestions (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 07:09:14 -0600
Ken, you said "World Top 10", while Yuri said "top 5 in their respective categories". Big difference. In your case, you are only going after the world SOAB HP entries. While Yuri would be going after
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00114.html (9,381 bytes)

229. Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestions (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 07:39:35 -0600
contesting . . . And if you want to see a really close analogy to cheating in contests, read this article about someone who has successfully figured out how to cheat in marathons: http://www.newyorke
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00155.html (8,123 bytes)

230. Re: [CQ-Contest] band plan definition - LSB vs USB (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 12:18:58 -0600
The following applies to amateur radio operators in the United States, quoted directly from the FCC regulations: 97.307(b) Emissions resulting from modulation must be confined to the band or segment
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00047.html (11,455 bytes)

231. Re: [CQ-Contest] band plan definition - LSB vs USB (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 14:24:02 -0600
Corrected to 14247 to 14347. No need to make 20 meters any smaller than it already is ! -- The following applies to amateur radio operators in the United States, quoted directly from the FCC regulati
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00053.html (11,641 bytes)

232. Re: [CQ-Contest] band plan definition - LSB vs USB (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 10:20:01 -0600
No. What do you mean, "No" ? Go back and reread what I said. Especially the part "at least 2.7 kHz above my suppressed carrier frequency". Your explanation completely validates what I said. You also
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00068.html (10,370 bytes)

233. Re: [CQ-Contest] band plan definition - LSB vs USB (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:18:10 -0700
For United States amateurs, this is a legal, not a band plan issue. Operating USB on 14151 does not violate the FCC rules. Operating USB on 14348 does violate the FCC rules. The CQWW rules do not spe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00100.html (9,869 bytes)

234. Re: [CQ-Contest] Operated Long in SS (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 07:40:28 -0700
Let the log checker handle it. He will stop scoring QSO's after 1440 minutes (24 hours) of operating time. You will see this later in the Log Checking Report (LCR). 73, Steve, N2IC Do I let the ARRL
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00215.html (8,268 bytes)

235. Re: [CQ-Contest] Bright side of ID non-problem (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:06:21 -0700
Having said that, I personally believe that some times it is okay to just TU for up to three/four Qs if you find yoursef in a situation where three or four stations have called you at once and you w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00298.html (8,213 bytes)

236. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP multi-2 strategy (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:49:40 -0700
In NAQP you have to stay on a band for ten minutes. I'm not personally experienced with the optimum strategy under current NAQP rules, but from perusing past results it seems that NAQP multis often d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00323.html (7,959 bytes)

237. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP multi-2 strategy (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:27:35 -0700
True somewhat, But if you have say 1000 Q's right now, and you work that one guy on Ten, you just gained 1000 more points for that ten minutes. What are the odds against you working on that original
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00333.html (8,123 bytes)

238. Re: [CQ-Contest] How isthe Skimmer different? (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:30:24 -0700
Very few automated CW methods allow a person to win a CW contest WITHOUT KNOWING ANY CODE except the CW Skimmer, partly due to the accuracy of this cursed system. True, spots can give you call signs,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00334.html (8,005 bytes)

239. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW CW P40W(W2GD) SOAB HP (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 13:33:03 -0700
Congrats to John on a super, iron-man effort in CQWW. I'm sure I couldn't have done 6000+ QSO's, hand-sent ! However, as a member of the N1MM Logger software team, I feel a need to clarify some of th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00354.html (8,520 bytes)

240. Re: [CQ-Contest] which contests would require me to sign AA7XT/0 (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:06:32 -0700
If there ever was a CQWW rule that required signing /0, it predates my move to Colorado in 1981. I'm sure there is --some-- contest out of the 250+ contests that requires signing /0, but none of the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00145.html (8,469 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu