- 1. [CQ-Contest] CQWW scoring proposals (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Tessmer" <mtessmer@cinci.rr.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 08:31:45 -0400
- Once again, we see calls for changing the scoring mechanism in the (apparently broken) CQWW Contest. Yet, we see no numbers to back up the proposals. There are 11 years of CQWW public logs available
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00094.html (6,657 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Madness (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Tessmer" <mtessmer@cinci.rr.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 16:58:11 -0400
- In your #1 you have two scenarios that are nothing at all alike. Which one does the contest change to? How do you decide? Without some kind of data to back up the proposal (showing how you will end u
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00216.html (11,660 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] Are you a Clueless Cluster Clicker? (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Tessmer" <mtessmer@cinci.rr.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:37:15 -0500
- I've read a number contest reports from the recent ARRL DX contests where DX ops share their annoyance with the large number of dupes - all the result of erroneous cluster spots. I've experienced the
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00146.html (8,945 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Copying exchanges in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Tessmer" <mtessmer@cinci.rr.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 10:39:57 -0400
- So some ops are incapable of understanding propagation and likely callsigns and this is 6Y2T's fault? A quick perusal of the list of busts that Yuri provided seems to indicate ample evidence of Clue
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00194.html (8,561 bytes)
- 5. [CQ-Contest] Hello old friend! (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Tessmer" <mtessmer@cinci.rr.com>
- Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 17:30:26 -0400
- Nice to see the annual Sweepstakes "check" thing again. We even get sort of a bonus "two-fer" deal this time, with a little "what is/isn't assisted" tossed into the mix. About three ops like to tweak
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-10/msg00177.html (7,224 bytes)
- 6. [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes on Sunday (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Tessmer" <mtessmer@cinci.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 10:13:40 -0500
- I'm trying to find the Sweepstakes rule that says you absolutely **MUST** operate for 24 hours. I'm not having much luck so perhaps someone could refer me to that section. 73, Mike K9NW _____________
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00219.html (6,478 bytes)
- 7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW SSB 2017 Effective DQ (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Tessmer" <mtessmer@cinci.rr.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2018 15:51:37 -0500
- Someone inadvertently places high in their category, can't provide a recording upon request, and the effort by the op essentially didn't happen. (Administrative Check Log) Someone submits their log 2
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-01/msg00154.html (8,578 bytes)
- 8. [CQ-Contest] Here's an idea... (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Tessmer" <mtessmer@cinci.rr.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 16:45:22 -0400
- Let's just make every contest the NAQP. No complicated exchanges. Everyone gets their (necessary for eternal bliss) start to finish rate fest, every time. No one has to invest more than 10-12 hours o
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-03/msg00076.html (6,758 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu