Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mschulz@creative-chaos.com: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY & Mac (score: 1)
Author: Michael Schulz <mschulz@creative-chaos.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:51:54 -0700
Hi, I would suggest fldigi as the best option for the Mac. It has also the widest selection of software modems for any other modes. 73 Mike K5TRI _______________________________________________ CQ-Co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00221.html (7,620 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Linux Logging Programs (score: 1)
Author: Michael Schulz <mschulz@creative-chaos.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 10:39:54 -0700
As a long time Linux user (20+ years) I can tell you that there is no application that even comes close to N1MM+. For every day logging CQRlog is great and I even wish someone would port it to Window
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00110.html (8,299 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is it OK to refuse to give out a QSO? (score: 1)
Author: Michael Schulz <mschulz@creative-chaos.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 17:32:57 -0700
It takes more time and completely destroys the rhythm when running to tell people they are dupes or B4 than rather work them and let the logger sort it out. Why bother? Nobody calls a dupe on purpose
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00179.html (16,820 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Raw Scores - 2015 CQ WW DX Contest CW (score: 1)
Author: Michael Schulz <mschulz@creative-chaos.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 16:53:08 -0800
Hi, The link posted is for SSB .. the correct one for CW is http://www.cqww.com/raw.htm?mode=cw Thanks for posting the scores so quick. 73 Mike K5TRI to issue ________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00113.html (9,347 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] MorseRunner beyond XP (score: 1)
Author: Michael Schulz <mschulz@creative-chaos.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2015 14:04:29 -0800
I use all my ham software stable and successfully on Windows 10 since the early Insider builds. Morserunner runs just fine (so does N1MM+, HRD 6.x, MMTTY, JT65). Please, please get rid of Windows XP,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00134.html (9,200 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Category hopping (score: 1)
Author: Michael Schulz <mschulz@creative-chaos.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2015 14:06:55 -0800
Borderline at best IMHO. 73 Mike K5TRI _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00135.html (9,456 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Category hopping (score: 1)
Author: Michael Schulz <mschulz@creative-chaos.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 10:15:33 -0800
AFAIK none. Because typically you enter the competition by signing up. When I was racing triathlons I would be automatically in a category based on age group, no hopping there, but everybody was alre
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00227.html (10,392 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Category hopping (score: 1)
Author: Michael Schulz <mschulz@creative-chaos.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 12:40:58 -0800
Dont confuse loopholes with rule breaking. Mike K5TRI --Original Message-- From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Martin , LU5DX Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2015 11:1
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00249.html (13,841 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Catagory (score: 1)
Author: Michael Schulz <mschulz@creative-chaos.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 21:09:51 -0800
They could only be a sore looser if indeed they did loose, but they didn't :). But then again the words referred to below don't seem to apply universally. Respect - show it to those who competed and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00283.html (12,164 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] 30m (score: 1)
Author: Michael Schulz <mschulz@creative-chaos.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 16:35:08 -0800
And on top of that breaking federal law. §97.313 Transmitter power standards. (a) An amateur station must use the minimum transmitter power necessary to carry out the desired communications. (b) No s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00322.html (10,555 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Survey results - part 1 (score: 1)
Author: Michael Schulz <mschulz@creative-chaos.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 08:37:10 -0800
Interesting results which show that if you want to be successful, be closer to or in Europe :). Regarding the age distribution, I see this concern all the time that there are declining numbers based
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00395.html (11,037 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Survey results - part 1 (score: 1)
Author: Michael Schulz <mschulz@creative-chaos.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 13:27:48 -0800
I guess the "Please copy ..." comes from maybe their first exposure to "contesting" during Field Day which is not a contest (yes it is, and we're going to win it anyway). And yes, leading by example
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00402.html (17,906 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time for a new cq-contest forum format? (score: 1)
Author: Michael Schulz <mschulz@creative-chaos.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 11:30:15 -0800
All the advantages you mention are already available to you right now. Turn on threaded view in your email client (e.g. Outlook), enable direct posting vs. approval etc. Archives are there as well ri
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00561.html (10,844 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu