- 61. Re: [CQ-Contest] Circle Jerks (score: 1)
- Author: "Dallas and Lucy" <ludal@dmv.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 09:24:41 -0400
- I think Pete's point was to give consistency to the rules for club completion over a wider variety of contests so that clubs don't have to jiggle there membership area to fit various sponsor's defin
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00346.html (9,054 bytes)
- 62. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU HF Champinship 2006 Results - comedy (score: 1)
- Author: "Dallas and Lucy" <ludal@dmv.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 06:46:48 -0400
- I think there are a number of reasons not to do this. For one, the contest committee is in a much better position to question and adjudicate irregularities. That's why they get the big bucks (sic). O
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00202.html (9,443 bytes)
- 63. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fwd: ve4vv, sk (score: 1)
- Author: "Dallas and Lucy" <ludal@dmv.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 04:43:30 -0400
- Another sad day. Contesters will miss Derrick as will his many other friends. I remember years when he was the only VE4 I worked in SS. RIP Derrick Dallas W3PP _______________________________________
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00212.html (6,864 bytes)
- 64. Re: [CQ-Contest] Domestic stations in CQWW (score: 1)
- Author: "Dallas and Lucy" <ludal@dmv.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 07:29:51 -0400
- This topic has been discussed before by some very prominent contesters, with varied takes on cause and effect. I have, in the past few days, received several "need for WAS" cards as a result of dome
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00084.html (10,114 bytes)
- 65. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut number advice (score: 1)
- Author: "Dallas and Lucy" <ludal@dmv.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 15:15:22 -0500
- Another take on cut numbers. Some operators, particularly those who were military cw ops, learned to copy on a mill. They were copying as a mechanical function where the coded characters actually tri
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00194.html (10,496 bytes)
- 66. Re: [CQ-Contest] cheating with packet (score: 1)
- Author: "Dallas and Lucy" <ludal@dmv.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:26:09 -0500
- I don't have a dog in this fight, and really don't care how the classes are arranged. I see it more as a function of sponsor initiative and how fine they want to slice the cheese. My point in this re
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00226.html (9,625 bytes)
- 67. Re: [CQ-Contest] Shut down the clusters during a contest. SImple. (score: 1)
- Author: "Dallas and Lucy" <ludal@dmv.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:45:05 -0500
- Simple, as in empty the ocean with a teaspoon W3PP _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-co
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00317.html (8,686 bytes)
- 68. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSL (score: 1)
- Author: "Dallas and Lucy" <ludal@dmv.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:17:27 -0500
- You say what? That should really get Bill Moore fired up. The rules are very specific regarding applications for DXCC.... QSO data on your cards is compared to the data you entered on your applicati
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00235.html (7,290 bytes)
- 69. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSL cards (score: 1)
- Author: "Dallas and Lucy" <ludal@dmv.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:49:43 -0500
- Paul, Sorry, not so. Cards for DXCC submission, to ARRL or to a field checker, are sorted by band and mode, then those with multiple QSO's per card. They are separated in the queue so that the checke
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00236.html (8,997 bytes)
- 70. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSL (score: 1)
- Author: "Dallas and Lucy" <ludal@dmv.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 07:33:23 -0500
- Apologies Wayne MY BAD 73, Dallas W3PP _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00259.html (8,833 bytes)
- 71. [CQ-Contest] Lots of recent topics (score: 1)
- Author: "Dallas and Lucy" <ludal@dmv.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 08:17:31 -0500
- Let me hear an Amen.... W3PP _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00057.html (7,254 bytes)
- 72. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer off air (score: 1)
- Author: "Dallas and Lucy" <ludal@dmv.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:27:14 -0400
- N1MM free - receiver board $13 - computer with monitor ca $700 - John's comment about the "Big Knob" - priceless W3PP _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contes
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00285.html (9,791 bytes)
- 73. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dollars/qso score (score: 1)
- Author: "Dallas and Lucy" <ludal@dmv.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 07:29:43 -0500
- Felipe, First, congrats on a great effort and thanks for all the Q's. I tallied up your antenna system, using very modest used prices, and came up with $2600. For new stuff, it would have likely been
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00105.html (10,367 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu