Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:laurent@ferracci.org: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stnsin IARUcontest ? (score: 1)
Author: Laurent Ferracci <laurent@ferracci.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:32:58 +0200
Why not reduce the final score of HQ station of the percentage of national QSO they did ? Laurent, F1JKJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00211.html (8,752 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1966 vs 2006 [was: Why didthe Canadians (PT5M)beat the (score: 1)
Author: Laurent Ferracci <laurent@ferracci.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:08:12 +0200
CT1BOH wrote "If we now look to the minutes with QSOs we can check that the Canadians had 294 minutes with QSOs 535 QSOs at a rate of 1,82 QSOs per minute and the Americans had 210 minutes with QSOs
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00332.html (8,185 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] QST contesting issue idea (score: 1)
Author: Laurent Ferracci <laurent@ferracci.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:41:28 +0200
John Geiger a &eacute;crit : How sad i was when i understood that, despite being #1 in France in my category, that wouldn't be printed in QST (whitch i'm subscribed to) ! At least, i got a nice pictu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00263.html (7,359 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Kenwood TS-950SD (score: 1)
Author: Laurent Ferracci <laurent@ferracci.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 20:37:18 +0200
Hi friends Sorry for being slightly off-topic, but as the TS-950 was (a few years ago) a high-end TRX, i suppose some are still found in contest shacks. The one i've got here drives me crazy. It will
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00035.html (6,963 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] cheating with packet - RD3A case (score: 1)
Author: Laurent Ferracci <laurent@ferracci.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:18:30 +0100
T&otilde;nno V&auml;hk a &eacute;crit : Hi Tonno, I would be interested in knowing how you did, in details, to produce this interesting report. Do you do that by hand (ex: To determine wether a singl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00229.html (9,544 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1)
Author: Laurent Ferracci <laurent@ferracci.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:17:49 +0100
Peter Voelpel a &eacute;crit : Example n.2: You hear the DXpedition and decide to dive into the pileup. You swith on your multi megawatt amplifier and call, call, call, call, call. No need to listen,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00363.html (9,930 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Shut down the clusters during a contest. SImple. (score: 1)
Author: Laurent Ferracci <laurent@ferracci.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:20:51 +0100
Dick-w0raa a &eacute;crit : Yes you did. But leaving contesting apart, a "no cluster week-end" would be a great way of helping people rediscover DX ! -- VFO knob preservation society. _______________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00364.html (9,130 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] CQ MARATHON 2007 high claimed scores ? (score: 1)
Author: Laurent Ferracci <laurent@ferracci.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:02:09 +0100
Hi, A few days ago, the CQ MARATHON website (dxmarathon.com) said that high claimed scores for 2007 will be posted soon after the submission deadline. Today, deadline is passed, and the website chang
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00244.html (7,308 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Get out of jail free card (score: 1)
Author: Laurent Ferracci <laurent@ferracci.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:12:36 +0100
Bill Tippett a écrit : I don't understand why Skimmer should be "allowed" "approved" or else. When transceivers with spectral display hit the market, were they "allowed" ? That's what i was blogging
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00268.html (8,085 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dead horse: CQ WW rules apparently prohibit CW Skimmeruse (score: 1)
Author: Laurent Ferracci <laurent@ferracci.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:32:01 +0100
Scott Robbins a écrit : Let's consider an IC-7800 or FTDX9000. They show you a "peak" on their 2nd receiver, and they can decode it to tell you whose signal it is. In short, they can tell you the cal
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00330.html (8,901 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] CQ Barcelona ! (score: 1)
Author: Laurent Ferracci <laurent@ferracci.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:41:58 +0100
It's been 3 or 4 times that i'm driving to and from Barcelona by car. When driving on the "Autopista" on the north (to/from Girona), just before/after the toll, on a hill, there's a nice antenna farm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00463.html (6,661 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Subject: "Reverse Beacon" Progress Report (score: 1)
Author: Laurent Ferracci <laurent@ferracci.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:54:59 +0200
k2kw-8@adelphia.net a écrit : Not sure. Nowadays, "spotted" means "instant pileup", but "more spots" automatically means "less people in each pileup". And nowadays, "most spots for rare mults" means
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00216.html (8,227 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] KCDXC CW Pile Up at Dayton 2008 (score: 1)
Author: Laurent Ferracci <laurent@ferracci.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 19:01:57 +0200
Alex Tkatch a écrit : ... will the SKIMMER compete ?? -- Laurent Ferracci, F1JKJ Blog radio: http://www.ferracci.org _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00314.html (7,391 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] CQWW SSB 2007 - UN7MMM(M) (score: 1)
Author: Laurent FERRACCI <laurent@ferracci.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:39:52 +0200
Hello friends If, like me, you checked your UBN file for CQWW SSB 2007, you may have seen the same incorrect call as me: 14289 PH 2007-10-27 0625 F1JKJ 14 UN7MMM 17 correct UN7MMMM When i saw that, i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00101.html (7,474 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking anomalies (score: 1)
Author: Laurent Ferracci <laurent@ferracci.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:43:55 +0200
David Thompson a écrit : No, it wasn't. All QSO lines in "UN7MMMM" log show UN7MMM as his call: Laurent, F1JKJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00113.html (7,649 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] More CQWW anomalies... (score: 1)
Author: Laurent Ferracci <laurent@ferracci.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:27:46 +0200
Yuri VE3DZ a écrit : No ! (i worked DK1F and didn't get a NIL) Only the CALLSIGN header field is taken into account by the robot. - If we have DL9LR in all QSO lines, but DK1F in the header, those wh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00115.html (7,641 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking errors (score: 1)
Author: Laurent Ferracci <laurent@ferracci.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 22:20:29 +0200
Tree a écrit : OK, so i'll add a little more feedback. I've checked my "DL9LR/DK1F" case. He used DK1F in the contest, had DK1F in the CALLSIGN header but all QSO lines contain DL9LR as his call. As
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00121.html (7,710 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu