Mail Archive Search: <+from:ksiid@access.mountain.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:ksiid@access.mountain.net: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] RE: Rookieness (score: 1): Author: ksiid@access.mountain.net (Tom Horton); Date: Thu Feb 12 12:19:20 1998; Randy, I'm rookier than you!!! I made my first un-assisted RTTY QSO this morning. Not too bad after 40+ years on the air. Now if I could just learn to type.I think that I might learn that right after; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00094.html (7,835 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] RE:WPX rules (score: 1): Author: ksiid@access.mountain.net (Tom Horton); Date: Tue Apr 7 09:42:35 1998; Blake, Very well put!!! Too many of these guys forget that if it isn't good for the little guy, the casual contester, the Joe Tribanders, the passersby, then it can't possibly be good for contesting!; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00116.html (8,508 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] K3LR a winner? (score: 1): Author: ksiid@access.mountain.net (Tom Horton); Date: Fri Apr 10 11:11:23 1998; Well....after 40+ years of contesting , I have finally found out how to be a winner! Now, how do I get on the Contest Committee??? Tom K5IID -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contes; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00160.html (6,740 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Cheating is cheating !! (score: 1): Author: ksiid@access.mountain.net (Tom Horton); Date: Thu Jun 4 16:04:11 1998; It seems to me that whether you are running excess power, run more power than your category allows, use packet spots while claiming single operator, operating in a portion of the band in which you ar; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-06/msg00024.html (6,962 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] QRP ???? (score: 1): Author: ksiid@access.mountain.net (Tom Horton); Date: Sat Mar 8 00:39:15 1997; Gosh....I am surprised that K4HQ has been asking for advice what with the score he reported in the ARRL SSB Test.....Qrp with a loop in the attic ?? Maybe some of us other QRP ops ought to be asking; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00118.html (6,494 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] OMNI VI vs FT1000MP (score: 1): Author: ksiid@access.mountain.net (Tom Horton); Date: Fri Mar 14 23:49:53 1997; Ok, it's tax time and for once I win. I am getting ready to buy a new radio. I would like info from folks that have used both the Omni VI and the FT1000MP. Which radio did you prefer , and why? What; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00205.html (6,728 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] OMNI VI vs FT1000MP (score: 1): Author: ksiid@access.mountain.net (Tom Horton); Date: Tue Mar 18 17:43:06 1997; Ok, it's tax time and for once I win. I am getting ready to buy a new radio. I would like info from folks that have used both the Omni VI and the FT1000MP. Which radio did you prefer , and why? What; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00252.html (7,002 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] OMNI VS FT1000MP (score: 1): Author: ksiid@access.mountain.net (Tom Horton); Date: Thu Mar 20 22:34:40 1997; A few days ago I asked for input on comparisons between the FT1000MP and the OMNI VI. I received many responses. Thanks to all who have answered! Well, it looks like the Yaesu boys have won out, but; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00292.html (7,501 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] Some Contest-Rule Topics (score: 1): Author: ksiid@access.mountain.net (Tom Horton); Date: Mon Jul 14 20:30:59 1997; I would be interested in seeing opinions from this group posted here regarding contesting in general for the following: 1) Should QRP and/or low-power category entrants call stations using high-power; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00164.html (9,633 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] Some Contest-Rule Topics (score: 1): Author: ksiid@access.mountain.net (Tom Horton); Date: Mon Jul 14 20:30:57 1997; Dick, This should be an interesting thread. Too bad I have to leave for Algeria in the morning and be out of E-Mail capability for the next month. Tom...K5IID 1. ABSOLUTELY NOT !!!!!!!!!!!!! Actuall; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00165.html (10,795 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] Some Contest-Rule Topics (score: 1): Author: ksiid@access.mountain.net (Tom Horton); Date: Mon Jul 14 20:30:59 1997; I would be interested in seeing opinions from this group posted here regarding contesting in general for the following: 1) Should QRP and/or low-power category entrants call stations using high-power; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00411.html (9,634 bytes)
12. [CQ-Contest] Some Contest-Rule Topics (score: 1): Author: ksiid@access.mountain.net (Tom Horton); Date: Mon Jul 14 20:30:57 1997; Dick, This should be an interesting thread. Too bad I have to leave for Algeria in the morning and be out of E-Mail capability for the next month. Tom...K5IID 1. ABSOLUTELY NOT !!!!!!!!!!!!! Actuall; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00412.html (10,921 bytes)
13. [CQ-Contest] Some Contest-Rule Topics (score: 1): Author: ksiid@access.mountain.net (Tom Horton); Date: Mon Jul 14 20:30:59 1997; I would be interested in seeing opinions from this group posted here regarding contesting in general for the following: 1) Should QRP and/or low-power category entrants call stations using high-power; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00644.html (9,628 bytes)
14. [CQ-Contest] Some Contest-Rule Topics (score: 1): Author: ksiid@access.mountain.net (Tom Horton); Date: Mon Jul 14 20:30:57 1997; Dick, This should be an interesting thread. Too bad I have to leave for Algeria in the morning and be out of E-Mail capability for the next month. Tom...K5IID 1. ABSOLUTELY NOT !!!!!!!!!!!!! Actuall; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00645.html (10,998 bytes)
15. [CQ-Contest] QSLs, Logs and stuff (score: 1): Author: ksiid@access.mountain.net (Tom Horton); Date: Thu Oct 16 09:48:52 1997; OK....I admit it...I am now, have always been, and probably always will be a QSLaholic. I'm sorry, I just like QSLs. Many of you know this already. One guy at Dayton a few years back called me the QS; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-10/msg00220.html (8,393 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]