Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ki9a@aol.com: 182 ]

Total 182 documents matching your query.

161. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why the 10 min rule anyway? (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 22:52:47 EDT
AMEN! That's my WHOLE point the whole time.. 73- Chuck KI9A In a message dated 8/2/2009 9:48:47 P.M. Central Daylight Time, wn3vaw@verizon.net writes: One radio on the air at a time... that is, for a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00028.html (8,963 bytes)

162. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Inspections (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:32:25 EDT
Amen to that! If they suspect someone, catch them via the logs they send in. 73- Chuck KI9A In a message dated 8/13/2009 7:29:02 A.M. Central Daylight Time, hank.k8dd@gmail.com writes: Random station
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00163.html (8,744 bytes)

163. [CQ-Contest] Better idea for inspections (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 09:28:20 EDT
Why don't we just make it easier. Attach a web linked vid camera in everyones shack, just to make certain the wattmeter shows the correct power, and a single op is a single op, and nobody is sneaking
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00209.html (6,728 bytes)

164. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Inspections (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 10:34:26 EDT
I have no problems with enforcement of the rules, but, random visits, to personal property, that's crossing the line in my very humble opinion. I would no doubt take a DQ, than to let a stranger in m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00210.html (9,667 bytes)

165. [CQ-Contest] Statio inspections (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 07:05:13 EDT
Do you guys at CQ, really believe you will catch a cheater, while being there? According to the rule, you have to announce that you will be there. I seriously doubt a cheat, will indeed cheat then. W
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00258.html (6,668 bytes)

166. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Musings... (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:26:20 EST
Heck, as long as there is a CW activity, I don't care if a robot is sitting next them on the couch! 73- Chuck KI9A In a message dated 11/9/2009 3:31:01 P.M. Central Standard Time, w9sz.zack@gmail.com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00202.html (8,280 bytes)

167. [CQ-Contest] Cut numbers in SSCW (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 20:56:18 EST
I've noticed in the last couple of years, there seems to be more and more use of cut numbers in SS. Guys, this is NOT the place to use them. With the mix of numbers and letters, the confusion is much
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00203.html (7,361 bytes)

168. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is holding QRG's legal? (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:44:21 EST
Ummm, Isn't this kinda what the NCJ SPRINT is all about?? I dunno why this is even an issue. It doesn't violate any rules, or, uh, "ethics" at all. If I'm mistaken, plus tell me why. Seriously, I rea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00463.html (9,287 bytes)

169. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is holding QRG's legal? (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:25:43 EST
Well, I guess sour grapes is a bit strong..my apologies, Hal. But, I still fail to see an issue...Multi op is in my interpretation, an operation at a single QTH, using multiple operators, keeping fre
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00464.html (10,920 bytes)

170. Re: [CQ-Contest] Holding a QRG: ethics vs rules (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:15:52 EST
So, I guess any club that makes a "club activity time", is also in violation? So, maybe 200-300+ club members should also be DQ'ed? In a message dated 11/24/2009 10:55:19 A.M. Central Standard Time,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00524.html (8,530 bytes)

171. Re: [CQ-Contest] USA stations in ARRL DX (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:02:46 EST
As contesters, we are always being called arrogant, among other names. Ignoring a station would just solidify that arrogance. We need a positive image among non contesters, ignoring a calling station
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00344.html (8,714 bytes)

172. Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of CW decoders in contests (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 18:35:14 EDT
My 2 cents.. WHO GIVES A CRAP? If it gets more guys on CW, that's FB! Many of these guys will get their speed up just thru operating. Look, guys, this is HAM RADIO, and it's a contest. Lets keep it F
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00022.html (7,170 bytes)

173. [CQ-Contest] Field Day class question (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 13:34:05 EDT
Guys Who makes the rules for FD? is it the CAC? Reason I'm asking this, is to try to find out why they removed the VHF station from class 1A a few years ago. Here are my thoughts on allowing 1A to re
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00315.html (7,048 bytes)

174. Re: [CQ-Contest] Nasty Cheerleading in favor of R36F (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 13:10:03 EDT
I agree 100% with Hans. I see nothing at all "nasty". Could it be one station was just a bit louder than the others? If you were to do this 100%, there would be claims of fist recognition.. 73- Chuck
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00131.html (10,511 bytes)

175. [CQ-Contest] nastyness in WRTC? (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 19:54:27 EDT
Barry, all, 1- You can't stop folks from spotting. Period. 2- You can't control, who spots who. Period. 3- If you are really worried about a station or stations, spotting another more than others, we
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00148.html (7,356 bytes)

176. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CC Update (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 21:22:14 EDT
Very true, Hans, but, letting the computer send the CW is more assistance on the air, than a packet cluster, isn't it? The computer is ACTUALLY doing the work sending CW. Just saying... 73! Chuck KI9
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-09/msg00114.html (7,350 bytes)

177. Re: [CQ-Contest] The danger of packet/cluster use (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:46:23 EDT
At this point, I would N E V E R enter this contest!!! I'd rather be a net control OP for the goiter pain group.. 73- Chuck KI9A In a message dated 10/28/2010 6:23:05 P.M. Central Daylight Time, k5zd
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-10/msg00232.html (7,593 bytes)

178. [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 07:11:11 EST
Is it just me, or more and more stations skipping the callsign part of the exchange?? I noticed this a couple years ago, and, this year, I had maybe 20 or so do this. Not sure how to handle this. Do
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00062.html (6,633 bytes)

179. Re: [CQ-Contest] Omitting callsigns in echanges (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 06:49:47 EST
Paul, needing reviewed or not, THEY BROKE the rules by not sending their call as part of the exchange!!! I certainly does not make it right to do this, just because you think the rules need changed..
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00155.html (7,278 bytes)

180. [CQ-Contest] skimmer/not to skim (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 11:32:05 -0500 (EST)
Guess what? I'm gonna get on, do my best, and have fun. Skimmer or no skimmer. Don't care... 73 & merry Christmas all! Chuck KI9A _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing li
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00356.html (6,584 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu