Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kenlow7@aol.com: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why Are EUR Contesters Younger - Example (KE3X) (score: 1)
Author: kenlow7@aol.com
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:37:54 -0400
Pete, Remi, Felipe, etc. ? I also think this?is a great thread, and?I'll quickly share?my experience in the last 12-months trying to get my own?kids interested in?contesting. ? My background is prett
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00432.html (14,551 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why Are EUR Contesters Younger - Example (KE3X) (score: 1)
Author: kenlow7@aol.com
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 13:18:34 -0400
Ken ? Very interesting read.. I see a couple of our assumptions being confirmed by you. but also 3/3 aint bad! you got your three children to get licenses under a year!!! ? If heavy brivary wasnt env
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00450.html (10,261 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Preliminary 2010 CQ WPX SSB/CW Contest Rules (score: 1)
Author: kenlow7@aol.com
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:32:02 -0500
occur it's the wrong way to go. I guess you need to remove SO2R possibility as single op soon to, since that can also be abused...*shakes my head* I was looking forward to do M/S in WPX but not anym
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00396.html (9,051 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Watch Your Dits ... or Change your Call (score: 1)
Author: kenlow7@aol.com
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:01:17 -0500
Randy - An excellent point. It's even worse if you are on the other end of the QSO because the endless corrections slow your QSO rate. So many stations were busting my old 'NV1P' call as 'N4JP' that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00551.html (7,730 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Op Available in Boston Area for ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: kenlow7@aol.com
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 10:53:06 -0500
Hi Folks - Turns out I'll be in Boston area during Feb 2010, but don't have a station set up there. If anyone needs an extra op for ARRL DX CW, can you send me a note off the reflector? Can't do the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00215.html (7,316 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW from All 40 Zones (KE3X) (score: 1)
Author: kenlow7@aol.com
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 03:45:51 -0500
Here's a random question: Has anyone ever operated the CQ WW contest from all 40 Zones, or is currently working towards it? 73, Ken KE3X _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mai
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00042.html (6,772 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW from All 40 Zones (KE3X) - thanks (score: 1)
Author: kenlow7@aol.com
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:15:03 -0500
Well that was quick! 10 replies in half a day ... thanks to all for the info. Confirms my suspicion that 40-zones would be a real accomplishment. See you on HF this weekend - the plan is to activate
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00064.html (10,263 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] SECTIONS (DC) (score: 1)
Author: kenlow7@aol.com
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 09:27:39 -0500
Also I would point out that Bill N6ZFO added DC in 2010 as a distinct multiplier in the NCCC Thursday Night Sprints. How's that for NCCC/PVRC teamwork, huh? Rich is absolutely correct about DC activ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00406.html (11,216 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Winners Announcement: NCCC Sprint Ladder IX and X (score: 1)
Author: kenlow7@aol.com
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 21:15:19 -0400
Ken, KE3X and Bill, N6ZFO are pleased to announce the following stations have won ham-made wine awards of W0YK Pinot Noir (www.munsvineyard.com) in the two most recent NCCC Sprint Ladder Competitions
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-04/msg00229.html (8,919 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Winners Announcement: NCCC Sprint Ladder XI (Spring 2011) (score: 1)
Author: kenlow7@aol.com
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 07:12:12 -0400
Dear Fellow Contesters - We are happy to announce the winners of the Spring 2011 NCCC Sprint Ladder, known to its beloved devotees as 'Thursday Night Contesting'. They are (drum roll please ...): Ove
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00087.html (9,061 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Looking for a station in Washington DC (score: 1)
Author: kenlow7@aol.com
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 07:15:41 -0400
Hi Scott - Great idea, but in DC good luck with the Zoning Boards. Anything more than 12-feet over a rooftop needs a permit, and below 12 feet over is still in the gray area depending on how the rule
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00124.html (9,051 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] Results of NCCC Sprint Ladder XIV - Spring 2012 (score: 1)
Author: kenlow7@aol.com
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 08:00:42 -0400 (EDT)
Greetings Contesters - The most recent running of the NCCC Sprint Ladder, 'NSL XIV - Spring 2012' has come to a close. This 14th running of the NSL was as popular as ever with 67 unique stations part
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-07/msg00363.html (8,508 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP (score: 1)
Author: kenlow7@aol.com
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 23:51:42 -0400 (EDT)
Hi Tor - Fear not - I have a deal for you: I'll get on from DC and you get on from MS, and we'll work each other (and everyone else ...) and we'll all be better off. Now there's a novel idea, huh? B
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00195.html (9,797 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] shack table height -optimal for CW contesting ? (score: 1)
Author: "kenlow7@aol.com"<kenlow7@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:12:38 -0400
On 20/09/2012 10:29 AM, Jeff Blaine wrote: > Ergonomics question.? Optimal table height? > Jeff - Agree with K8MR's answer. Recommend keeping your radios adjustable and close to keyboard and desk fro
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00219.html (7,947 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] Results of NCCC Sprint Ladder XV Summer 2012 (score: 1)
Author: kenlow7@aol.com
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 20:43:25 -0400 (EDT)
Greetings Contesters - The results are in for the NCCC Sprint Ladder, 'NSL XV - Summer 2012'. This 15th running of the NSL saw 65 unique stations participating over the 8-week competition period. The
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00326.html (8,041 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL 160m CW and Skimmers (score: 1)
Author: kenlow7@aol.com
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 12:35:06 -0500 (EST)
Bob - It could just be your interface is not displaying above 1850. For example, in N1MM Logger, you can fix this by: The defaults for 'CW Sub Bands' appear to be set below the RTTY sections, to avoi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00009.html (8,534 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-Assisted vs. Assisted (score: 1)
Author: kenlow7@aol.com
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:04:00 -0500 (EST)
Hal - There's an easy 4-letter explanation for that: W-R-T-C. As long as the WRTC qualifying rules penalize Assisted entries, there's no way the top guys will choose that category for their Single-O
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00356.html (8,994 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu