Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kenke3x@gmail.com: 37 ]

Total 37 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] WAE QTC tactics (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 07:21:25 -0400
"I DISAGREE - It is much faster to just send QTC? And get an answer YES or NO. If Yes then send Callsign. WHY - The caller knows if he has got some QTC's from you. Else he wouln't ask for it Best 73
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00148.html (11,021 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Audio Recordings (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 17:10:20 -0400
"I applaud CQWW for asking the top scoring guys to submit audio recordings in the upcoming WW contests. Wouldn't it be nice if those recordings could become public, much like the current Cabrillo fil
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00055.html (8,200 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] When do we spot? Should it be required? (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:29:14 -0400
"I am happy to report that, thanks to N1MM, this will be changed in the next release of N1MM Logger+. 73, Steve" THANK YOU Steve !!!! There were a whole bunch of stations who polluted the band map l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00260.html (9,575 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Club Scores and Old Farts radius (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 06:59:22 -0500
"If you are PVRC, YCCC, FRC, FCG, NCCC, etc. and have been submitting scores for 20 years or more to the SAME club, why should you have to submit scores to a club in a new area to which you have no a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00218.html (7,518 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Club Scores and Old Farts radius (score: 1)
Author: Kennan Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 12:12:36 -0500
"Remote into your old club zone may not be permitted in all contests. Some contests require that you live in and operate within the circle. So, check the rules for the contests you are interested in.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00226.html (8,373 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] High Rate Dual Radio CQing (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 07:25:11 -0500
Someone commented there was no audio on the ZF2MJ YouTube video. To hear audio of a MorseRunner run at 60wpm, click here for a sample from YT6W, a frequent HST competitor: https://m.youtube.com/watch
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00048.html (9,066 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] High Rate Dual Radio CQing (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 13:01:26 -0500
"After some hours, or after some tens of hours, you get to a level you notice some routines. Practicing the routines so they go under your skin helps - gradually ... Dual running causes fatigue." For
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00157.html (9,116 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Catagory (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 07:58:32 -0500
"Kelly, It's much more than just trying to gain an unfair advantage. Please reread the the first paragraph which contains words like "respect , fairness, ethics and fellowship". But the last one is t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00291.html (11,307 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Survey Results - part 2 (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 16:37:52 -0500
"So if my Son W0TOL works only me in a contest I get penalized or I get my friends that don't normally work contests to get on and work me and they choose to work only me I should get penalized?" Yes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00616.html (8,693 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Power Level (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 13:04:14 -0500
I agree with Tree. Yes, the NAQP rules allow HP entries as CheckLogs, so it's technically 'permitted'. But in PVRC we promote NAQP as a 'gateway contest' to develop new talent. We have added many new
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00068.html (8,042 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 08:19:00 -0500
Actually we don't. In the NA Sprint, many stations send 'Dit Dit' to indicate confirmation. It's a commonly accepted practice. Ken KE3X _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mail
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00156.html (8,586 bytes)

32. [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Your Call? (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 08:29:59 -0500
... And yes - I know the callsign is part of the exchange in the Sprint. That's not the point. The point is 'Dit Dit' is a commonly accepted way of acknowledging confirmation of a QSO, just like 'TU'
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00159.html (9,426 bytes)

33. [CQ-Contest] NAQP Revised Rules (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 08:58:56 -0500
"A big THANK YOU to the NAQP managers for bringing DC into the fold." Chris - Ditto from me - thanks and look for the DC ops to be out in force in 2017 and beyond! 73! Ken KE3X ______________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00215.html (8,183 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] Observations of a young ham (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 07:28:03 -0500
"There is something (or many somethings) that is failing to attract the younger generation(s) that nobody has quite identified yet." I think it's easily identifiable: that 'something' is the social a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00355.html (9,719 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP - DC is now a multiplier (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 16:04:11 -0500
"Now all we need is for more operators from DC to get on and contest." Hi Stu - It's easy to see the historical activity by reviewing 3830 postings from W3DQ, NN3RP, N8HM, 4U1WB, W3HAC, KE3X and othe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-01/msg00158.html (8,806 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Meaning of Disqualification (score: 1)
Author: Kennan Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 12:35:14 -0400
I only check the CQ-Contest Archives about once a month - quite surprised to see this thread about AJ3M being disqualified using 4U1WB callsign. This is completely ridiculous: - Why now, after so man
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-10/msg00264.html (11,419 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] 4U1WB: ARRL DX Contest: Rule 6.1 (score: 1)
Author: Kennan Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 22:19:12 -0500
Hi Ed - Maybe elsewhere thats true but not in DC you cant! Heres a reality check: 1. The noise floor here is S-7 on a good day, S-9 plus 20dB on a bad day, and you get called an alligator by email af
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-02/msg00126.html (7,353 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu