Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kenke3x@gmail.com: 37 ]

Total 37 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Survey (score: 1)
Author: "kenke3x@gmail.com"<kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:24:28 -0400
"So very sadly, today's Generation X has no clue on how to operate, and it shows.... But hey, look at all the new "operators" we've brought into contesting. Oh boy.............. > "As a member of "Ge
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00437.html (10,416 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse beacon of my own call ? (score: 1)
Author: "kenke3x@gmail.com"<kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:12:12 -0400
"2. QSO alerting assistance: The use of any technology or other source that provides call sign or multiplier identification along with frequency information to the operator. It includes, but is not l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00288.html (8,989 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] on line scores (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:33:25 -0500
"As the contesting community has adjusted to the requirement for logs to be sent in and posted for all to see, it is now time to change this unnecessary behavior and openly post your score for all to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00294.html (8,562 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Evolving scoring systems (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 07:36:07 -0500
"I am not attempting to solve any issues with a particular contest. My scoring comments then emphasized by Mark, are being suggested as a means to sell radio contesting to a huge group of younger peo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00029.html (11,877 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:02:58 -0500
"I think some of the software has a setting where it will automatically send a CQ after so many Q's are logged.? That would work to make it legal." True, Win-Test has that feature, but it only helps
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-01/msg00211.html (10,074 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 08:37:02 -0500
"1. I find that skipping IDing works best with smooth, no fill, in rhythm QSOs. An ID serves a useful function after a QSO requiring a repeat, or after a guy who calls at half the speed of the pileup
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00005.html (10,337 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Working Zero Pointers.... (score: 1)
Author: Kennan Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 06:26:51 -0500
Lloyd - Fully agree. I figure many of those domestic stations are potential new contesters, or might need DC for an award. And these days DC is rarely on the air unless it's a contest weekend, so its
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-03/msg00056.html (9,012 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] PVRC Reunion Event This Weekend June 6-8 (score: 1)
Author: Kennan Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 07:58:31 -0400
Dear Contesters - Please note our annual PVRC Reunion is coming up this weekend June 6-8. The PVRC Reunion encourages all PVRC menbers worldwide, especially those who have moved outside the PVRC circ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-06/msg00011.html (7,695 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ohio QSO Party - Saturday! (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 12:35:29 -0400
"The 2014 state QSO party fall season kicks off this weekend with the Ohio QSO Party, on Saturday from 1600Z to 0400ZSunday (noon to midnight EDT)." Hi Jim - "Kicks off"??? Maryland DC QSO Party was
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-08/msg00123.html (7,805 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA Sprint SSB Activity? (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 07:51:41 -0400
"Maybe the malaise isn't the Sprint itself, but the lack of leadership in the contest clubs? I've been one of the first (sometimes THE first) in a contest club in which I'm a member, to ask "Is anyon
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00155.html (9,320 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Move to disband MAR section in Canada (for contesting) (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 07:26:46 -0400
"DC wants to split from MDC, but it's also rare to find a DC station workable from the west coast, especially since W3DQ has been laid up." Hi Jim - sorry but your statement is false: 1. When is the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00344.html (9,536 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] A comment from SS (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 10:29:59 -0500
"That's definitely the PVRC effect at work - since MD is something like only the 16th most populous state and ranks 25th in licensed hams. Very high percentage of those licensed hams getting on in SS
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-11/msg00131.html (8,819 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] ow to change rules in a Contest - MAR (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:18:35 -0500
"KE3X ... took the lead plate when it came to the new SSB Sprint." To clarify for the benefit of CQ-Contest readership, there are two separate issues being discussed in this thread: MAR sub-sections
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00227.html (9,864 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB Sprint - Thank You ! (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 06:46:29 -0500
Jeff - DC will have at least 4 stations on ... I won't list them here, lest I cross the line into 'cheerleading ahead of the event' (not quite up there with deflating footballs, but just sayin') Hats
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00262.html (8,521 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Early CW Sprint Practice -- Thursday (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 09:22:57 -0500
Ray - No change to NA Sprint CW rules, multipliers or how logging programs handle that event. See you Saturday night! Ken KE3X _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-02/msg00042.html (9,441 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] K4VV in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:11:07 -0500
Hi Gerry - It depends on the country. In Switzerland I was HB9/KE3X. 73! Ken _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-02/msg00159.html (10,556 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 22:08:17 -0400
Fully agree with Dave. Consider this analogy - one of my sons in is a world class gamer who builds his own computers. He explains in Korea they have pro gaming competitions where competitors are up o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00135.html (14,433 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Q-Signals for Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 19:33:59 -0400
Jim - The answer is simple: The Contest Committee needs to start DQ'ing participants based on crappy CW signals - only then will the behavior change. I assume when that happens, the Committee will p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00326.html (9,023 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposed rules changes (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 07:08:28 -0400
"I will be changing my station to include that capability should I ever be fortunate enough to have a high enough score to attract their interest." I am not picking on Kevan with my reply - but I hav
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00554.html (11,505 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 qualifications (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 21:22:14 -0400
"Once more I would like to ask our German friends to reconsider two important parts of rules: 1. Qualification period. It is really too short. Needless to repeat reasons why it should be longer. 2. W
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00759.html (7,501 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu