Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k9mi@sbcglobal.net: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting software and RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:54:41 -0000
John, I think most use WriteLog with the MMTTY engine. You have to have MMTTY installed(like you already do) but you don't run it. You just run WriteLog once things are configured correctly. 73, Mike
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00888.html (10,020 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-920 - IC-718 (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 13:01:48 -0000
Not in this life time. Mike, K9MI _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00904.html (9,160 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest]Packet or not (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:58:33 -0000
Is it time to quit beating this dead horse yet? 1. Packet isn't going anywhere. Do you guys really expect the guys that put their hard earned money and work into the packet networks, to shut them off
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00480.html (11,116 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] radio recommendations (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 22:06:40 -0000
In that price category, of which I'm in most of the time also, IC-765, TS 850 or FT 990 would all be good choices if the rigs were in good shape, and filters would be a nice touch. A friend found an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-06/msg00014.html (9,778 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Contest radio selection (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:22:36 -0000
This weekend, I probably did a dumb thing by selling my Omni 6. Second thoughts have me wondering what I should replace it with. I did have an 850 before, and I did miss not having the Monitor featur
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-06/msg00256.html (7,267 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] What does this question mean? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 02:09:38 -0000
Sounds like the "key click" police Bill. I had the very same thing happen to me, in the same contest a few years ago. I was running a TS 850 at the time. Now that I have a 1000 MP, I think my answer
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-08/msg00070.html (9,415 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: 40 Metres in UK (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:03:32 -0000
Also, the UK stations need to be informed that 7.153 is as low as US stations can go, not 7.150. A voice transmission on LSB on 7.150 will be wide enough to be in our novice band, and you can bet the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-10/msg00162.html (9,957 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww ssb spotting report (score: 1)
Author: Michael Brown <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:08:58 -0800 (PST)
Respectfully, I know where you're coming from Hans, but... With all the money invested, I doubt the guys who built the network will just go over and shut it all down forever just because a few guys c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00070.html (11,933 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why SS is like it is (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 21:56:26 -0000
I vote for keeping the last 3 hours. A lot of years, the Ft. Wayne hamfest falls on the same weekend, and I'm "doing my duty" for the local club. I get home and get those 3 hours to operate. Being "f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00698.html (9,285 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Frequency owners (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 13:42:56 -0000
With a not so great station, I don't get on and "run" very often. So, I always tell the qrm gang to be nice, because if I leave, someone with a real signal will take my place. Doesn't work, but at le
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00391.html (15,099 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Rig (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 23:17:14 -0000
I bought a used MP that was pretty much filtered to the max. As luck would have it, my car dies. After 14 years! They should make those things better! Anyway I hated to see the MP go, but sometimes p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00016.html (9,226 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] MFJ/Hygain RBD 5 (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 03:02:42 -0000
When they first came out with that new analyzer that would work on UHF (plus it had other features over the previous model), our club bought one and it didn't take long before it broke. A phone call,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00201.html (10,115 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Icom 746 as contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: Mike Brown <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:36:42 +0000
John, a 746 (non pro, right?) is extremely easy to use with computer control and a contest logging program. You don't have to buy Icom's expesive interface. They can be had for around $40 and work fi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00407.html (8,949 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Used Rig Query for New Contestor (score: 1)
Author: Mike Brown <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:44:39 +0000
Interesting Bill. I have my shack all apart and was looking at the number on my Field. Those sure are tiny numbers/letter. I have diabetes and my eyes are changing all the time anyway. Mine is: 5J330
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00408.html (9,186 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Icom 746 as contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: Mike Brown <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:36:07 +0000
I'm not totally against a 746 Pro, but I saw all the reviews on EHam and the biggest complaint was transmitter failures. Did Icom get that fixed? Mike - K9MI _________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00461.html (8,314 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:33:05 -0000
CT out of business? I'm not a CT user, but there is a CT Win that I believe works in XP. I thought I saw something about not supporting voice keyer, but it did mention support now for NAQP and Sprint
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00352.html (13,373 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest bashers (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 04:39:02 -0000
SOS, different day, right Mark? It's too bad that such a great hobby is so divided. Not just contesting and non contesters. I can think of a huge list, that amounts to "them against us". Just the nat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00696.html (8,015 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest bashers (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 04:53:29 -0000
Denny, were the stateside stations transmitting below 3750? Or were they working split, transmitting in the US portion of the band and listening on say, 3610? If they were transmitting down that low,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00699.html (9,902 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Official ARRL Section Name Use on SSB? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 06:19:25 -0000
I've never heard of the ARRL having a problem with the use of phonetics. If a station is getting a lot of request for fills for the Section, I see it as a benefit to all concerned. What is it that De
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00262.html (10,230 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] new 75 m privileges (score: 1)
Author: "Mike K9MI" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 21:55:35 -0000
I agree with you Jim. I think 3650, giving the phone portion 100 khz would have been a little more realistic. With it changing to 3600, that is going to force Rtty stations to go probably, as low as
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00299.html (9,292 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu