Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k7sv@comcast.net: 31 ]

Total 31 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] remember this? Russian Woodpecker (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Schimelpfenig" <k7sv@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:15:10 -0400
Both antenna systems are incredibly impressive.I visited the Jim Creek Station at Marysville WA in the mid 70s. The antenna is supported between large pylons betwen three mountain tops. Huge wires f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00171.html (7,452 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Ic 706 Mark 11 and Writelog for NAQP CW (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Schimelpfenig" <k7sv@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:59:05 -0400
Bill, There has been a lot of dicussion regarding choppy cw on this reflector and others. Many have found that by stopping other applications running in the background has helped. I'd suggest you do
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00373.html (6,650 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Ic 706 Mark 11 and Writelog for NAQP CW (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Schimelpfenig" <larryk7sv@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:46:19 -0400
Guess I just don't notice the lousy cw generated by Win Test or Writelog running under XP! Hope no-one else notices it.... 73 de Larry K7SV _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00003.html (7,184 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Ic 706 Mark 11 and Writelog for NAQP CW (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Schimelpfenig" <k7sv@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 17:36:14 -0400
running under XP! Hope no-one else notices it....Hey guys that was a tongue in cheek response to Dennnis's comment regardingchoppy cw. Some folks experience the problem and some don't. I use both WT
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00013.html (6,774 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] A3S or TH-3JRS or ELSE? (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Schimelpfenig" <k7sv@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 06:24:34 -0400
While I have no experience with the TH-3JR, I have been pleasantly surprised with the performance of the A3S. As I tried to do SO2R with one tower, I had an A3S fixed to the west at 30 ft on the 75 f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00218.html (7,379 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] [TowerTalk] Skyhawk, KT36XA, opinions requested (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Schimelpfenig" <k7sv@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:03:35 -0400
note and I am including George's reply below. The real question I have is -- Has anyone taken a KLM KT34XA with the 15M problem and modified it with the M-squared upgrade kit and had the antenna per
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00162.html (7,691 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Schimelpfenig" <k7sv@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:46:57 -0500
A lot of good suggestions based on lots of experience have been provided. I tend to agree with Andy AE6Y, to start out small and build up. As has been discussed in another thread on this reflector, S
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00386.html (8,675 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Schimelpfenig" <k7sv@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:06:40 -0400
operators do. Anyone who does it any other way is a machine operator, a computer operator, a data operator - describe it how you like, they're not CW operators. We can argue technology forever, but
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00425.html (7,285 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Louisiana Contest Club Formally Organized! (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Schimelpfenig" <k7sv@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:31:55 -0400
Congratulations on your new organization! 73 de Larry K7SV _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00158.html (7,010 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] N4TO SK (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Schimelpfenig" <k7sv@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:27:38 -0400
Very nice write-up by Dan. Vic was a super CW op. While I really enjoyed chasing all the mobile ops around the state during FQP, I'm really going to miss hearing N4TO in there! RIP my friend. 73 de L
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00225.html (6,925 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] Audio Feedback From Wave File (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Schimelpfenig" <k7sv@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 07:32:44 -0400
Dick, When you're recording the audio, are you using a headset with boom mike? Do you have audio monitor turned on on the rig? If so, perhaps the level of the monitor is set higher than it was before
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00226.html (7,215 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] Sprint Procedure (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Schimelpfenig" <k7sv@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 00:26:38 -0400
Bob, Here are the rules regarding QSY, taken from the NCJ web site: Special QSY Rule: If any station solicits a call (by sending CQ, QRZ?, "going up 5 kHz," or any other means of soliciting a respons
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00121.html (7,332 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] SOME THOUGHTS ON USING THE K3 ON SSB (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Schimelpfenig" <k7sv@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:04:06 -0400
What I'm about to relate here may very well be posted at other spots on the Inet, but I haven't had much luck in finding it, so this will hopefully be helpful to contesters using the Elecraft K3 on p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00226.html (9,708 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] 2008 CQWPX CW M/M PLAQUE (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Schimelpfenig" <larryk7sv@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 08:51:20 -0400
Speaking for EY8MM, K1SE, K4EC, K4EU, K4ZW, NR4M, N2YO, W4DF, WA4JUK and myself, many thanks to Jim AD1C for sponsoring the M/M plaque that the NR4M crew received this week. This plaque is just one o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00235.html (7,131 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2008 CQWPX CW M/M PLAQUE - Busted call (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Schimelpfenig" <larryk7sv@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 13:18:04 -0400
K2DG should have been listed as K1DG of course! _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00240.html (7,362 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX Serial numbers for M/M with two transmitters on a band (score: 1)
Author: "Larry - K7SV" <k7sv@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 15:09:46 -0400
I'm looking for anyone who has done M/M with two transmitters on a band in the CQ WPX contests. The problem we're realizing is serial numbers. Separate serial number sequences are used on each band f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00272.html (7,041 bytes)

17. [CQ-Contest] A couple of post-CQWW observations (score: 1)
Author: "Larry - K7SV" <k7sv@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:37:44 -0400
"Pet peeve: QRZ <dx call> "AD1C" AD1C 59 <zone> "Thanks 5904" <dx call> So I did work him or not? Did he lose my puny signal in the QRM/QRM/QSB? Please say SOMETHING besides just your call. One stati
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00403.html (7,751 bytes)

18. [CQ-Contest] Preliminary 2010 CQ WPX SSB/CW Contest Rules (score: 1)
Author: "Larry - K7SV" <k7sv@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:56:28 -0500
Al Crespo (F5VHJ) and George Fremin III (K5TR) both make very valid points. I think the question is, how would the rule change affect the following considerations? 1. Would we gain or lose activity?
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00342.html (7,599 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] CW Skimmer in NAQP? (score: 1)
Author: "Larry - K7SV" <k7sv@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 00:40:16 -0500
"Yeah, the RTTY Roundup is starting to look like a better option for that weekend" I think Steve N2IC expressed my sentiments with his comment. While I normally prefer CW contests, I think that joini
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00342.html (7,095 bytes)

20. [CQ-Contest] wide-band cw decoding: the heart of the problem (score: 1)
Author: "Larry - K7SV" <k7sv@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 06:44:51 -0500
As far as I am concerned, Hans succinctly hit the nail on the head when he said "If it points you to a QRG outside your current audible passband which contains a new callsign or a new multiplier, it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00417.html (8,007 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu