Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k1ar@aol.com: 82 ]

Total 82 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] Does the KCDXC still do the pileup contest at Dayton? (score: 1)
Author: K1AR@aol.com
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 11:11:22 EDT
Further to Trey's comments, I plan to enter the KC Suite pileup contest remotely from the 2nd floor super-suite, operating only 4 of the 5 minutes due to age and fatigue. Best of luck to all. 73 John
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00556.html (8,397 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges (score: 1)
Author: K1AR@aol.com
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 12:40:53 EDT
Ranko, There is a difference here: Using M6T is legal and allowed by the rules. Not sending a report is illegal and specifically against the rules. Here is a philosophy that I try to follow: Respecte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00781.html (9,590 bytes)

43. [CQ-Contest] CQ News: Randy Thompson, K5ZD, Named WPX Contest Director (score: 1)
Author: K1AR@aol.com
Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 13:14:24 EDT
CQ Communications, Inc. / 25 Newbridge Rd. / Hicksville, NY 11801 / Phone: (516) 681-2922 / Fax: (516-681-2926) / e-mail: w2vu@cq-amateur-radio.com NEWS RELEASE For more information, contact: Richard
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00203.html (8,461 bytes)

44. [CQ-Contest] Skimmer Withdrawal? (score: 1)
Author: K1AR@aol.com
Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 13:10:32 EDT
All, This one is time sensitive, hence the "pre-Dayton" post. Thanks to Bob, N6TV, for the heads up. 73 John, K1AR A survey on skimmer technology is running on contesting.com. Please read the survey
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00218.html (7,159 bytes)

45. [CQ-Contest] CQ HOF Announcement (score: 1)
Author: K1AR@aol.com
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 08:48:37 EDT
In case you guys didn't see this, what follows is CQ magazine's Hall of Fame announcement for their entire program, including the induction of Randy, K5ZD and Paolo, I2UIY into the CQ Contest Hall of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00309.html (11,273 bytes)

46. [CQ-Contest] New Skimmer Reflector (score: 1)
Author: K1AR@aol.com
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:26:58 EDT
Dear Contesters, As most of you know, there has been considerable discussion regarding skimmer and related topics on this reflector. The subject has essentially taken over the channel to the point th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00502.html (8,040 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fills and repeats (score: 1)
Author: K1AR@aol.com
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:20:09 EDT
Rowland, Try using better antennas (sorry, too hard to resist)! Seriously, I've always subscribed to the theory of keeping it simple. Sending "NR agn?" or just "NR?" is best. Trying to be cute with c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00135.html (9,861 bytes)

48. [CQ-Contest] Stirring the Pot (score: 1)
Author: K1AR@aol.com
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:00:14 EDT
All, Most of us are about to participate in the world's biggest contest in a little over a week (CQ WW SSB) and no one is even talking about it on this channel. How about some posts that discuss prop
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-10/msg00093.html (7,390 bytes)

49. [CQ-Contest] Submitting CQ WW logs (score: 1)
Author: K1AR@aol.com
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:14:32 EST
All, As a fellow who supports the CQ Committee in a number of areas, I thought I'd some guidelines for submitting your WW logs (yeah, I should have posted this a month ago): 1) CW logs go to _cw@cqww
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00019.html (8,882 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1)
Author: K1AR@aol.com
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:44:41 EST
Guys, We beat this topic to death in July. It's probably time to move on unless you have something new to add to the thread. So far, what I've read is a re-hash of what was said a few months ago. Hop
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00507.html (8,290 bytes)

51. [CQ-Contest] Moving On, Please? (score: 1)
Author: K1AR@aol.com
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 12:35:59 EST
It amazes me that there are some folks on this channel that make more posts to CQ-Contest than actual contest QSOs, yet are so passionate about the open logs debate. With that being said, let me try
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00586.html (6,898 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] OLD data (score: 1)
Author: K1AR@aol.com
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:29:19 EST
Dick, AD1C has written a fantastic freeware utility that does exactly what you are looking for: K4XU.bin --> K4XU.adi. You can download it at _http://software.ad1c.us/_ (http://software.ad1c.us/) BTW
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00160.html (7,884 bytes)

53. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX SSB and Earth Hour (score: 1)
Author: K1AR@aol.com
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:21:03 EDT
Ilkka, Yes. Your score will be lower. 73 John, K1AR In a message dated 3/26/2009 8:44:06 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Ilkka.Korpela@Helsinki.fi writes: A multi-station can run 48 hours, but if we do o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00526.html (7,744 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ robot not ready for prime time (score: 1)
Author: K1AR@aol.com
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:59:56 EDT
The robot problem has been fixed. More up-to-date information about the contest can be found at _http://www.cqww-vhf.com/index.htm_ (http://www.cqww-vhf.com/index.htm) . 73 John, K1AR In a message da
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00175.html (8,366 bytes)

55. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest-Preferred Segments (score: 1)
Author: K1AR@aol.com
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 12:24:17 EDT
All, After reading all of the mail on this subject, here is my take: 1) There are a bunch of unenforceable, uncoordinated band plan recommendations in place. 2) No one is going to observe them in thi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00323.html (12,286 bytes)

56. [CQ-Contest] New Contesters & CQ-Contest (score: 1)
Author: K1AR@aol.com
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:24:35 EDT
All, Most of can become pretty passionate when we think about the topic of new contesters. We remember our early days of operating and the enjoyment we had at that time (and hopefully still today!).
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00305.html (8,370 bytes)

57. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why Are European Contesters Younger? (score: 1)
Author: K1AR@aol.com
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:43:05 EDT
All, This is a great thread -- thanks to N4ZR for starting it. I'm always interested in real data when topics like this one emerge. My email provider and I may both regret this, but if you're interes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00408.html (8,753 bytes)

58. [CQ-Contest] Results of Age Survey (score: 1)
Author: K1AR@aol.com
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:09:39 EDT
All, You may recall about a month ago, based on a thread discussing contest experience and age, that I would gather and analyze the information for you based on an informal survey. What follows is a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-09/msg00228.html (8,688 bytes)

59. [CQ-Contest] Survey -- Improved Format (score: 1)
Author: K1AR@aol.com
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:13:42 EDT
Sorry for the poor formatting in my original message. 73 John, K1AR All, You may recall about a month ago, based on a thread discussing contest experience and age, that I would gather and analyze the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-09/msg00229.html (8,435 bytes)

60. Re: [CQ-Contest] Results of Age Survey (score: 1)
Author: K1AR@aol.com
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:27:02 EDT
Darn it! That was a typo. The overall first licensed age was 17. Not having a good formatting experience today. 73 John, K1AR In a message dated 9/28/2009 1:20:36 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, aa5jg@ya
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-09/msg00230.html (10,369 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu