Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k.kerr@abdn.ac.uk: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Any experience with a Pro 3? (score: 1)
Author: Keith Kerr <k.kerr@abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 10:59:10 +0000
Hi All, A rig question and I am hoping there is some experience out in contest-land which may be shared. I am planning to add another ICOM radio to the shack. I am a happy user of an IC775 and would
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00071.html (8,604 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contests without no-packet operation (score: 1)
Author: Keith Kerr <k.kerr@abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 13:23:13 +0000
Well said. I could not agree more. Keith GM4YXI (GM7V) Small towers, SO2R (but inept), packetless shack Comparing packet to big beams and towers is nonsense. The bottom line is there is only one pers
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00299.html (8,589 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ tips and tricks - not (score: 1)
Author: Keith Kerr <k.kerr@abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 13:08:16 +0000
I have been known to do this sometimes. I actually recall a few years ago (but apologies if I am misquoting him here) Fred, K3ZO , an operator whom I much admire and respect, saying this was what he
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00562.html (10,868 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ tips and tricks - not (score: 1)
Author: Keith Kerr <k.kerr@abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:18:53 +0000
I rather regret dragging Fred into this! I agree 100% with your comment: no right of ownership is/was assumed. If someone comes back I'm off. Barry W2UP, however makes a very valid point and I can se
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00583.html (12,521 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Ham shops in Vancouver? (score: 1)
Author: k.kerr@abdn.ac.uk (Dr K Kerr)
Date: Mon Aug 4 15:43:01 2003
Hi folks, Will be in Vancouver in a few days time. Anyone know if there is a ham radio store in the city worth visiting? Keith GM4YXI
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00086.html (6,164 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] Re: Dupes (score: 1)
Author: Dr K Kerr <k.kerr@abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 18:02:16 +0000
Hi Jim, If I am getting a lot of dupe calls I ask myself: Is there a bum spot out on me on the cluster? Am I unintelligible....crap signal, sending too fast? Am I not signing often enough? I worked C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00091.html (12,657 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Recording contests (score: 1)
Author: Keith Kerr <k.kerr@abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:37:09 +0000
Hi all, I see more and more mention of contest recording on the reflector and elsewhere. I am clearly several years behind the times with all this but really want to catch up and record my contests.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00778.html (7,122 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX SSB: 40m operation (score: 1)
Author: Keith Kerr <k.kerr@abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 13:08:02 +0000
Hi Jim, I agree wholeheartedly with this sentiment but it was my impression that not enough guys on the NA side were listening in this area. I spent a lot of time calling CQ around 7102-3, listening
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00063.html (10,706 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Radio as Carry-On Luggage? (score: 1)
Author: Keith Kerr <k.kerr@abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:01:10 +0100
Hi Craig, This comment does not directly address your question but may be of interest to you and the wider audience. To fit in with some business meetings etc I had to travel by air from Glasgow to B
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00223.html (10,115 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] Bencher paddles (score: 1)
Author: Keith Kerr <k.kerr@abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:11:01 +0100
It is interesting to observe the 'drift' on a subject as the number of postings increases.....our version of 'Chinese whispers' I guess. My Bencher attracted attention due to its odd X-Ray profile. O
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00245.html (7,106 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] Spotting and disqualification (score: 1)
Author: Keith Kerr <k.kerr@abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:38:24 +0100
Chris GM3WOJ wrote recently on the UK contest reflector: 'I subscribe to the school of thought that the DX Cluster has 'de-skilled' our contesting (and DXing) to a noticeable degree - it's use should
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00276.html (8,283 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Spot/Log Correlation (score: 1)
Author: Keith Kerr <k.kerr@abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 14:11:04 +0100
NO THANK YOU Not again! I know this is repeating the same old story but I cannot let this pass. Yes, people are abusing the cluster Yes, people are DQed when caught Yes, I agree that the publicity sh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00051.html (8,390 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] cheating with packet (score: 1)
Author: "Kerr, Prof. K.M." <k.kerr@abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:54:18 -0000
This particular thread is becoming an annual event. So be it. I generally don't rise to this bait but on this occasion I must. I love contesting. I love finding and working multipliers. I don't have
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00248.html (10,486 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] cheating with packet (score: 1)
Author: "Kerr, Prof. K.M." <k.kerr@abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:25:42 -0000
Yuri, Gedas should be congratulated on his work. No single working of a mult can be considered damning. We could all innocently 'find' a mult that just happened to have been spotted. It is the PATTER
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00524.html (13,205 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "Kerr, Prof. K.M." <k.kerr@abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:22:32 +0100
Guys, I have been following this skimmer debate on and off for some time with an increasing feeling of horror and dismay. I haven't had the time or desire to interject but this is a short post. Surel
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00281.html (10,809 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] rules (score: 1)
Author: "Kerr, Prof. K.M." <k.kerr@abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 22:54:32 +0100
Eric et al, I am not sure that the question of whether or not the skimmer has a material impact on scores is the issue? It seems to me that it is more a case of how this new technology is perceived a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00134.html (10,748 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge (score: 1)
Author: "Kerr, Prof. K.M." <k.kerr@abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 18:46:43 +0100
So how do we determine it's actual impact? We allow it's use for a time so gauge that impact. If Skimmer users start dominating classes, then it might be time to direct it's use to one category or an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00235.html (10,999 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] single-op pornography (score: 1)
Author: "Kerr, Prof. K.M." <k.kerr@abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:35:34 +0100
Doug, I agree 100%. This seems to me to be the core of the debate. ANYTHING which finds, identifies and displays potential QSO partners in a way that the SO without this particular technology could n
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00393.html (9,224 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Stirring the Pot (score: 1)
Author: "Kerr, Prof. K.M." <k.kerr@abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:58:10 +0100
Hello all, I'll rise to the bait! Been trying to get antennas organised for the weekend as time allows. Spent all last Saturday trying to find out why my trusty but not rusty C3 had poor SWR on all b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-10/msg00191.html (11,309 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dx peditions and contests (score: 1)
Author: "Kerr, Prof. K.M." <k.kerr@abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:02:30 +0000
To be fair to K5D, my impression was that, this weekend, they did a lot less 40m CW than they might otherwise have done. I presumed this was a recognition by them of the potential problem you describ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00244.html (8,398 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu