According to one website, $100 in 1977 was worth $406.40 in 2016. Still not worth it to risk a job and possible jail time. http://www.dollartimes.com/calculators/inflation.htm 73, Jim N6VH RE: http:/
Scott, Why would other stations think you were in MN? Your call doesn't indicate that. If you were calling CQ and a non-MN calls you, just put him in the log (or not) and move on. Granted, the QSO wo
Joe, You might want to be careful using that /OH indicator. From the FCC rules 97.119: "No self-assigned indicator may conflict with any other indicator specified by the FCC Rules or with any prefix
Bill, I agree. Like you I have over 1000 prefixes confirmed on LOTW. Even if it is cheaper than QSL cards, I'm just not willing to pay that much for that award. 73, Jim N6VH On 4/29/2017 6:37 AM, Bil
Ron, Yes, LOTW is much cheaper than cards. However, I wasn't interested in the award when I had to collect cards, and I'm not interested it at $120 or more. After all, I can use eQSL for free, execpt
Ron, It isn't a presumption. WPX is set up on LOTW, and the cost is 12 cents per QSO. I agree with a flat fee, but I'm thinking more along the lines of $5 or $10. Possibly charge 0.12 per QSO up to t
It isn't just new contesters that are turned off by those two things. Some of us who have been around awhile are also. Granted, I'm not as active as the big guns, but I would probably get more involv
I agree with Hans. I don't see any need to have FT8 signals spotted on RBN. Yes, I do use FT8 quite a bit. 73, Jim N6VH That, coupled with the very detailed graphic presentations at sites like pskrep
I have both N1MM+ and Log4OM running at the same time. N1MM+ logs each QSO to Log4OM as soon as it is logged in N1mm+. If I work a station not in the contest (a needed DX in a different mode, for exa