Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jpreston1@cox.net: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] e qsl (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 16:14:51 -0700
This is done automatically in LOTW. A busted call won't show up as a QSL in either station's LOTW file. Therefore, no need to reject it. 73, Jim N6VH snip.............. snip.............. ___________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00003.html (9,247 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fringe reception (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 20:10:58 -0800
Pete, The frequency of 87.9 MHz is not in the FM broadcast band. The lowest frequency in that band is 88.1 (this is the center channel frequency). There is one exception. Class D noncommercial educat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00182.html (9,702 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Rohn Going SK? (score: 1)
Author: jpreston1@cox.net (Jim Preston)
Date: Sat Jul 26 09:04:32 2003
The main reason for the delisting is that Rohn stock (ticker symbol ROHN) has not met the minimum $1.00 bid price in over a year. ROHN will still be carried on the OTC Bulletin Board. AS to whether t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00316.html (9,025 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cheating (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:56:42 -0800
Packet is allowed in SS for single op. It is the SO Unlimited category. 73, Jim N6VH snip..... _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http:/
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00358.html (7,544 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] UBN call confirmed by LOTW ?!?!?!!? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 11:53:37 -0700
Jamie, If you worked 8P1A in CQWW CW, it was probably 8P5A instead, and therefore a busted call. 8P5A was in the CW test, 8P1A was in the SSB test. 8P5A submitted a log for CW, 8P1A submitted one for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00167.html (8,447 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW and 0 pointers (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 08:25:11 -0700
The distance from San Diego to Seattle is about 1000 miles. Both are in zone 3. Central Texas (Zone 4) is about the same distance. Using your suggestion, I would get zero points for the Seattle QSO,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00172.html (9,391 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:27:58 -0700
snip... snip... To which should be added: 1.1 Sending of Morse code shall be done completely by hand using a hand-key, or at most a "bug". The use of a memory keyer or computer generated cw puts the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00449.html (10,015 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 06:32:52 -0700
If you consider a code reader to be assistance, why not a memory keyer or computer generated cw? For that matter, computer logging. All of those give the operator as much assistance as a code reader.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00489.html (10,511 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX RTTY - change the rules! (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:25:59 -0800
Maybe it's time to give points for same-country contacts in CQWW CW & SSB, so we don't have to make zero-point contacts just to get mults. In the WPX RTTY contest, over 60 percent of my QSO's were wi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00261.html (7,844 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Writelog still in business?? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 08:43:45 -0700
I ordered Writelog on Friday, paid by Paypal, and received the registration code and the link to the download by e-mail in a few hours. Jim N6VH _______________________________________________ CQ-Con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00024.html (8,312 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is QSL Bureau pertinent in today HAM Radio (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:07:57 -0700
Joe, For stateside QSL's, LOTW is the way to go. It's much cheaper and easier than sending direct. Even if the bureau were opened to stateside QSL's (which it probably won't), LOTW would still be the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-03/msg00214.html (10,968 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is QSL Bureau pertinent in today HAM Radio (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:24:32 -0700
Joe, Actually, a large number of stateside hams use it, as well as a pretty good number of DX stations. As far as stateside QSL's (the focus of your original post), there is no problem making WAS wit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-03/msg00238.html (13,832 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Different Location, (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 11:46:34 -0800
Joe, It has been that way for many years. One reason for doing it that way is so other stations will know what country you are in without having to hear the rest of your call. If I'm operating from H
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00016.html (9,029 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Two points for intra-NA QSOs in CQWW? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 07:41:47 -0700
Yuri, The original meaning of DX was distance. If I work Tijuana, Mexico, which is 20 miles away, I get 2 points. But if I work you, at 2400 miles away, I get 0 points. 73, Jim N6VH -Regards Yuri N2T
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00214.html (10,973 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX Penalty (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 08:10:42 -0700
Bob, It's in the FAQ area: http://www.cqwpx.com/rules_faq.htm 73, Jim N6VH On 5/24/2013 6:02 AM, rob wrote: With all the recent talk of CQ WW penalty change I was wondering about WPX. Maybe I missed
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00221.html (7,505 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] NILs hurt (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 09:29:52 -0700
Jukka, That doesn't always work. In a recent contest, a running station confirmed my exchange. However, I hadn't sent an exchange yet. He then went on to work another station. Since I hadn't sent my
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-09/msg00045.html (9,448 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] K4VV in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 12:50:03 -0800
Larry, The requirement is still the same - hasn't changed. 73, Jim N6VH 73, Larry W6NWS --Original Message-- From: Gerry Hull Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 12:04 PM To: Edward Sawyer Cc: CQ-Contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-02/msg00164.html (10,317 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log4OM glitch (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 06:37:09 -0700
FT4JA shows in the correct place on my computer, using Log4OM 1.24. Incidentally, why did you send this to the contest list? Jim N6VH FYI Charly, HS0ZCW ______________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00019.html (7,179 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] modest proposal ...up to 200w (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 15:09:01 -0700
The ARRL HF contests have a power level of 150 watts or less for the HF contests, and have for many years. This seems like a good balance between 100 and 200 watts. 73, Jim N6VH On 10/10/2016 8:20 AM
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00223.html (9,877 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Holding back your score? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 14:17:03 -0700
I agree. I don't post my scores, because they are so low nobody would be interested. :-) 73, Jim N6VH Posting claimed scores is more of a courtesy to the community and is not required. By not posting
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00109.html (9,226 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu