- 1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQMM DX Contest unwritten rule (score: 1)
- Author: John Owens NN6U <john@nn6u.net>
- Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 19:05:18 +0000
- Based on the awkward wording in the rules of "shall be considered participating stations from competition", it seems like they are trying to only include people intentionally participating in the con
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00094.html (10,119 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB Pileup Contest? (score: 1)
- Author: John Owens NN6U <john@nn6u.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 05:21:21 +0000
- Stan, I'm glad to see your perspective on FTx contests. Every time I see someone saying it's like watching paint dry, or that their computer makes all the contacts while they go get a beer, it tells
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2025-08/msg00078.html (11,002 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Uh oh, NAQP must skew older than I thought (score: 1)
- Author: John Owens NN6U <john@nn6u.net>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 06:17:27 +0000
- Agreed - and also some named Ava, Emma, and Mia (all nice-sounding on CW). 73, -John NN6U Someone posted log analysis of their NAQP CW score to 3830 and showed that John was the common name, I think
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2026-01/msg00109.html (9,368 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu