Mail Archive Search: <+from:jmax@attglobal.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:jmax@attglobal.net: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] QST (score: 1): Author: jmax@attglobal.net (jmax@attglobal.net); Date: Tue Jan 29 11:47:19 2002; Al - I'd like to respond to one of your comments, below. Al, where did you get that 80% figure? And, additionally, if you want to run a popularity contest on the numbers, you're doomed to failure. AR; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00646.html (10,801 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Re: The contest conflict discussion (score: 1): Author: jmax@attglobal.net (jmax@attglobal.net); Date: Sat Feb 9 10:08:59 2002; Every time I see the subject header "Morons at the NCJ" I cringe. Perhaps I'm an old fuddy-duddy, but it's hard to see how such rudeness helps the discussion. Can't the subject of the thread be chang; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00097.html (7,267 bytes)
3. Fwd: Re: [CQ-Contest] Polling (score: 1): Author: jmax@attglobal.net (jmax@attglobal.net); Date: Wed Feb 13 09:52:07 2002; Jim - The survey was adjusted to be representative of all ARRL members, which consists of lots of contesters and even more non-contesters. If the survey were biased in favor of contesters, of course; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00171.html (10,740 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] I watch with interest, but with great sadness (score: 1): Author: jmax@attglobal.net (jmax@attglobal.net); Date: Wed Feb 13 18:41:58 2002; I've been surprised at the response to this piece - several of you have actually taken it seriously. Folks, it's satire! He's pulling our legs! You need go no further than the first paragraph to pick; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00190.html (13,158 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] I watch with interest, but with great sadness (score: 1): Author: jmax@attglobal.net (jmax@attglobal.net); Date: Thu Feb 14 14:03:39 2002; Lou - 1. There has been no proposal to eliminate DXCC. 2. There has been no proposal to eliminate staff travel related to DXCC. Additionally, you should understand that the League is in the middle of; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00210.html (13,003 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] The OO Strikes Back (score: 1): Author: jmax@attglobal.net (jmax@attglobal.net); Date: Fri Mar 8 18:08:55 2002; Ron - Of course, what *may* have happened is that the OO heard so many problematic QSOs above 14.347 that he/she prepared the forms to cut down on the time required to fill them out. Even OOs like to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00098.html (9,162 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] OO reports (score: 1): Author: jmax@attglobal.net (jmax@attglobal.net); Date: Sun Mar 10 08:25:09 2002; Ron - I believe that most who have read your post understand that you aren't berating the OO. Having said that - Could you, perhaps, still be jumping to a conclusion? You *assume* that he/she was sit; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00165.html (12,009 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]