- 21. [CQ-Contest] avoiding NIL's (score: 1)
- Author: jfunk@adams.net (jim funk)
- Date: Fri May 14 10:46:06 1999
- "Does anyone see anything wrong with sending the other stations call at the start of my exchange?? It does take time but just might save some NIL errors later. Only talking about CW...." I see this h
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00258.html (7,152 bytes)
- 22. [CQ-Contest] ILL QSO is *NOT* this weekend! (score: 1)
- Author: jfunk@adams.net (jim funk)
- Date: Fri Sep 10 03:13:15 1999
- Don't believe everything you read in QST (gasp!). The Illinois QSO Party is NOT, repeat NOT, this weekend. I think, actually, it's the INDIANA party, but I'll let somebody from east of the border cla
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-09/msg00039.html (6,609 bytes)
- 23. [CQ-Contest] Kids' Contest (score: 1)
- Author: jfunk@adams.net (jim funk)
- Date: Thu Jan 1 11:07:48 1998
- Okay, guys and gals. Several times a year the "graying of contesters" thread hits the publications or the reflector and we moan and groan and decry the trends and propose solutions. If you're getting
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00004.html (6,893 bytes)
- 24. [CQ-Contest] ARRL SSB ramblings (score: 1)
- Author: jfunk@adams.net (jim funk)
- Date: Tue Mar 10 22:55:20 1998
- Well, that's over.... Last weekend and the CW weekend were like two different contests here in the Black Hole. For SSB, 15 was the place to be and the low bands were the pits. I could have forgotten
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-03/msg00166.html (10,024 bytes)
- 25. [CQ-Contest] Contest Exchange in a better System of scoring (score: 1)
- Author: jfunk@adams.net (jim funk)
- Date: Thu Apr 9 00:34:34 1998
- Clive's suggestion sounds a LOT like the Internet sprINT! Speaking of which, when will we get N6TR slowed down enough on his programming to schedule another one of these?? 73, Jim N9JF "If opportunit
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00148.html (6,779 bytes)
- 26. [CQ-Contest] 10 meter write-up (score: 1)
- Author: jfunk@adams.net (jim funk)
- Date: Mon Jun 22 23:52:39 1998
- Rerunning the entire 10 meter contest results, under the circumstances is the ARRL's only way out of this mess. It's encouraging that steps are underway to prevent its happening again. The write-up,
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-06/msg00193.html (7,038 bytes)
- 27. [CQ-Contest] Illinois QSO Party (score: 1)
- Author: jfunk@adams.net (jim funk)
- Date: Thu Oct 16 11:19:24 1997
- Greetings, Don't forget the Illinois QSO Party this Sunday afternoon/evening. Starts 1800Z on Sunday, ends 0200Z Monday. Nice, civilized length for a QSO party, lots of fun, lots of mobiles and count
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-10/msg00222.html (6,797 bytes)
- 28. [CQ-Contest] hypothetical (score: 1)
- Author: jfunk@adams.net (jim funk)
- Date: Sat Nov 8 10:16:30 1997
- Greetings, This question is prompted by a recent SS situation, but could apply to any contest in which a maximum operating period (less than the total contest period) is specified. Suppose three or f
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00187.html (7,523 bytes)
- 29. [CQ-Contest] SS exchange (score: 1)
- Author: jfunk@adams.net (jim funk)
- Date: Sun Nov 9 19:42:17 1997
- KG5U wrote: "ask them something out of context, like 'RST?'" I asked four stations for my RST during SS (because I wanted to KNOW...). Three of the four disappeared. The fourth had to be asked five t
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00219.html (7,953 bytes)
- 30. M0AAA (score: 1)
- Author: jfunk@adams.net (jim funk) (jim funk)
- Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:28 2005
- If MM0OOO is set aside for Guernsey, either KM0O or AC0W should activate it. Jim N9JF
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00272.html (6,921 bytes)
- 31. cows (score: 1)
- Author: jfunk@adams.net (jim funk) (jim funk)
- Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:28 2005
- It's about time KM0O got in here to defend his namesakes. I remember during CW SS about three years ago, working KM0O and AC0W back-to-back. I glanced at the clock, and sure enough -- it was time for
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00312.html (5,835 bytes)
- 32. 160 Contests (score: 1)
- Author: jfunk@adams.net (jim funk) (jim funk)
- Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:37 2005
- max time operated, especially for single ops, of something less than the 42 hours, like maybe 30-36. K2WI was right, daytime gets a bit boring. The only rationale I can see for operating the whole 4
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00825.html (12,726 bytes)
- 33. [CQ-Contest] "please copy" (score: 1)
- Author: jfunk@adams.net (jim funk)
- Date: Mon Jun 24 19:19:34 2002
- "I'm sorry, Doctor. I just can't take it any longer. You're going to have to help me." "What seems to be the problem?" "I've been listening all weekend to people saying, 'Please copy', followed by so
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00208.html (9,862 bytes)
- 34. [CQ-Contest] bringing up newbies (score: 1)
- Author: jfunk@adams.net (jim funk)
- Date: Tue Jul 23 18:17:41 2002
- In regards to the QST contesting coverage, the following are my opinions, free and worth every penny: 1) The change to web coverage from print coverage for line scores is happening. We'll see how it
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00373.html (8,295 bytes)
- 35. [CQ-Contest] 15 days...not yet.... (score: 1)
- Author: jfunk@adams.net (jim funk)
- Date: Sat Jul 27 11:49:33 2002
- Though I am in sympathy with the desire to speed contest results to view, I find the proposal to drop the log submission deadline to 15 days post-contest to be in potential conflict with *last week's
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00493.html (7,111 bytes)
- 36. [CQ-Contest] pre-contest e-mails (score: 1)
- Author: jfunk@adams.net (jim funk)
- Date: Sun Jul 28 13:36:22 2002
- K1TTT wrote: ""... But if you really want to try to drag in the casual guys don't just send reminders to log submitters. Go collect all the calls worked in a contest from the logs (maybe make that al
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00521.html (6,895 bytes)
- 37. [CQ-Contest] top ten (score: 1)
- Author: jfunk@adams.net (jim funk)
- Date: Mon Oct 7 12:57:51 2002
- Top Ten reasons to work the ILLINOIS QSO PARTY on October 20: 10) Warm up for Sweepstakes. Sunday evening rate the way SS would *like* to be! 9) Only eight hours. Doesn't alienate family. 8) Starts a
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00056.html (6,888 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu