Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:i4jmy@migate.n8it.AMPR.ORG: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] WWDX, stop and go ? (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@migate.n8it.AMPR.ORG (i4jmy@migate.n8it.AMPR.ORG)
Date: Thu Oct 29 10:45:24 1998
Hi Guys, The content of this message has no will to be a proposal, it's only a written form of something growing in my mind. In the case the same thoughts occur to many others, it might become someth
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-10/msg00044.html (7,146 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Re: CQ WW CW 1997 results...some analyse (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@migate.n8it.AMPR.ORG (i4jmy@migate.n8it.AMPR.ORG)
Date: Mon Nov 2 14:08:48 1998
If I'm not wrong, a certain mistakes percentage doesn't bring any more to any disqualification, in CQWW. It was before the accurate log checking that the 3% rule existed and could mean that. Anyway,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00023.html (8,131 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Re: CQ WW CW 1997 results...some analyse (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@migate.n8it.AMPR.ORG (i4jmy@migate.n8it.AMPR.ORG)
Date: Tue Nov 3 18:16:42 1998
Hi Guys, few days ago, I posted a message about something I find well related to the Timo's analysis. Unluckyly the answers I got weren't devoted to clear up my doubts. Let me now be very straight to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00044.html (8,099 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Re: Score Reduction Penalties Are Good Policy (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@migate.n8it.AMPR.ORG (i4jmy@migate.n8it.AMPR.ORG)
Date: Thu Nov 12 09:08:56 1998
N6AA told that WWDX contest analysis is voted to prize the accuracy in logging and not only awarding the big logs. Well, altough I agree 100% with log checking that makes WWDX results quite reasonabl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00177.html (8,214 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Re: 160 NOISE (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@migate.n8it.ampr.org (i4jmy@migate.n8it.ampr.org)
Date: Sun Dec 6 13:46:06 1998
Hi Bob, I made a number of experiences on 160/80m with commercial and home made null steerers, but finally I decided that commercial ones, whitout a number of modifications or adds (i.e. filters) wer
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-12/msg00017.html (8,618 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] Night openings on 10m (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@migate.n8it.AMPR.ORG (i4jmy@migate.n8it.AMPR.ORG)
Date: Wed Dec 9 02:35:14 1998
....correct, but the main reason is that trans equatorial paths are always and anyway much better than those on the same emisphere. Similar conditions, infact, have been reported from africa, even f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-12/msg00032.html (7,528 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Re: QSO B4... NO YOU DIDN'T! (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@migate.n8it.ampr.org (i4jmy@migate.n8it.ampr.org)
Date: Fri Dec 11 08:27:43 1998
I can confirm, possibly adding something else to the above. Last '97 cqww I was sb 80 and, among other similar episodes, I heard a huge number of european stations calling EA8BH (not a weak signal)
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-12/msg00062.html (7,537 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] Re: ARRL 10 rules (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@migate.n8it.AMPR.ORG (i4jmy@migate.n8it.AMPR.ORG)
Date: Wed Dec 16 03:51:29 1998
I don't agree with the above statements neither I understand where the problems are with cw/ssb point rates and with the MS time on. The 10m contest is already a great contest like it is, and it's g
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-12/msg00121.html (8,578 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu