Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:i4jmy@iol.it: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

21. [CQ-Contest] Doubts on the WPX Contest (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
Date: Sun Apr 2 19:57:54 2000
Hi pile up rates are nice, likewise that anything works as an antenna when the solar flux is so high, but.... With high flux numbers, hi rates, high bands opened 24h x day and people cought by the 10
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-04/msg00010.html (8,031 bytes)

22. [CQ-Contest] Doubts on the WPX Contest (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it)
Date: Mon Apr 3 12:52:00 2000
Wally, also the ARRL dx, on a dx perspective, is a run contest but it doesn't desertize some bands and leaves room for strategy. 73, Mauri I4JMY -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-04/msg00011.html (8,151 bytes)

23. [CQ-Contest] Doubts on the WPX Contest (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it)
Date: Mon Apr 3 12:32:51 2000
Brian, first of all, to move in the most populated band and run (whose tactic is also the only available to increase the number of a very generic mult like pfxes) is definitely a strategy but also th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-04/msg00012.html (10,808 bytes)

24. R: [CQ-Contest] When and why did rules change? (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
Date: Thu May 4 00:32:12 2000
Probably it's my own interpretation, but the TS original spirit was that to start a category whose environment and antenna requirements weren't too big to allow a large group of standard equipped Ham
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-05/msg00028.html (9,559 bytes)

25. [CQ-Contest] When and why did rules change? (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it)
Date: Fri May 5 19:04:50 2000
Why not ? Because an OWA dipole is not in a single piece ? Then, also a tapered/trapped element or even a trapped dipole (count the wires between traps) would be not allowed. In my eyes, the fashion
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-05/msg00044.html (8,857 bytes)

26. [CQ-Contest] SO2R IS A Seperate Entry Class (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it)
Date: Thu Jun 1 17:14:50 2000
While I'm convinced two radios, and a smart and tailored setup when used at best, can produce a significant difference and beat the obtainable results of a single radio user in the same place, I'm no
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00017.html (12,306 bytes)

27. [CQ-Contest] SO2R a new category? (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it)
Date: Fri Jun 2 11:56:17 2000
Ridiculous ? May be, but basically not so impossible or strange since the actual "cure" to keep playing a population suffering a lack in turn over seems to be that to tailor everything to the individ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00048.html (10,731 bytes)

28. [CQ-Contest] 14MHz harmonics in 28MHz band (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it)
Date: Tue Jun 6 19:37:54 2000
It's not impossible that even 50-100 mW into a single feed multiband antenna (i.e. a multiband yagi that's efficient and has gain also on the harmonic related band) are enough to be heard thousands k
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00146.html (7,302 bytes)

29. [CQ-Contest] RE HG1S in WPX CW 2000 (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it)
Date: Thu Jun 22 17:44:35 2000
Was a bad behaviour generating a lapsus ? Actually, there's no MM category in IARU international contest and only HQ stations can have one station per band. Multi entrants have to play as MS,or at le
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00208.html (9,493 bytes)

30. R: [CQ-Contest] Re: Last 2 (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
Date: Thu Jul 29 01:46:14 1999
...." This has nothing to do with limited capability pileuppers deliberately asking for partialized calls and with people with such wrong habit. The "ending in" (starting with, or simply with) doesn
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00064.html (7,402 bytes)

31. R: [CQ-Contest] Re: Last 2 (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
Date: Thu Jul 29 01:46:14 1999
...." This has nothing to do with limited capability pileuppers deliberately asking for partialized calls and with people with such wrong habit. The "ending in" (starting with, or simply with) doesn
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00188.html (7,382 bytes)

32. R: R: [CQ-Contest] Highest ever rate ? (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
Date: Tue Aug 3 19:06:50 1999
Some point is still missing....: PJ is in South America while V2 is in North America. Avoiding any other consideration, V2 gets an (but useless to win) advantage over Europe in working the same conti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00021.html (9,695 bytes)

33. R: [CQ-Contest] 3QP nightmare (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
Date: Sat Aug 14 17:35:16 1999
I don't agree with your view point because the comparison you made is not complete and what you look for is finally a gift from the organizers rather than anything else. In contesting we don't use mo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00114.html (7,384 bytes)

34. R: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
Date: Sun Aug 22 13:31:04 1999
What get's easier in log checking having a serial number I can't understand. Slightly obscure is also why a DX station has the double need to "decode" a multiplier and also a serial number. This doub
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00169.html (9,964 bytes)

35. R: R: [CQ-Contest] Highest ever rate ? (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
Date: Tue Aug 3 19:06:50 1999
Some point is still missing....: PJ is in South America while V2 is in North America. Avoiding any other consideration, V2 gets an (but useless to win) advantage over Europe in working the same conti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00282.html (9,697 bytes)

36. R: [CQ-Contest] 3QP nightmare (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
Date: Sat Aug 14 17:35:16 1999
I don't agree with your view point because the comparison you made is not complete and what you look for is finally a gift from the organizers rather than anything else. In contesting we don't use mo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00375.html (7,387 bytes)

37. R: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
Date: Sun Aug 22 13:31:04 1999
What get's easier in log checking having a serial number I can't understand. Slightly obscure is also why a DX station has the double need to "decode" a multiplier and also a serial number. This doub
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00430.html (9,972 bytes)

38. [CQ-Contest] UBN (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it)
Date: Wed Apr 17 19:06:49 2002
Checked UBN fles of last WWDX SSB. Found removed QSOs and mults. Used Writelog, all contest digitally recorded and easy to target and listen to verify each single doubt. A number of bad QSO is instea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00203.html (7,352 bytes)

39. [CQ-Contest] A lot of strange BADs in UBN - actually not! (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
Date: Thu Apr 25 13:09:05 2002
The CQWWDX is definitely my favourite contest also because of the great job that's behind, the accurate log checking and the respect I've for the huge effort of the committee. The weak point in the s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00366.html (11,062 bytes)

40. [CQ-Contest] Re: [CQ-Contest] Restoring High Band/Low Band categories in ARRL DX Test (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it)
Date: Wed Jun 19 18:16:13 2002
At medium high latitudes when the sun-cycle will be low, an "high band" category will merge more or less into a SB20 entry. 73, Mauri I4JMY -- Initial Header -- To : "cq-contest Reflector" <cq-contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00178.html (11,004 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu