Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:hank.k8dd@gmail.com: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Preliminary 2010 CQ WPX SSB/CW Contest Rules (score: 1)
Author: "hank.k8dd" <hank.k8dd@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:44:19 -0500
I agree with Mike. M/S - the old CQ style - was fun, and took some thought and strategy. M/S - the new CQ style - well, it's turned it into an ARRL style M/S class with prefix's for a mult. Not as mu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00350.html (9,955 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] the "new" M/S for WPX (score: 1)
Author: "hank.k8dd" <hank.k8dd@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:22:40 -0500
So if the end result is that none of this will matter in terms of participation .... Why change? Is this change being made to keep the critics (nice way to define them) quiet? K8DD -- "I knew that Go
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00362.html (8,481 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX...how to REALLY change the rules (score: 1)
Author: "hank.k8dd" <hank.k8dd@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:07:49 -0500
I agree with that statement! That could never happen .... The scores will be to high - the numbers too big in both total score and multiplier count - and take up too much space in the results. CQ wou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00435.html (8,385 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is holding QRG's legal? (score: 1)
Author: "hank.k8dd" <hank.k8dd@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:27:00 -0500
So you don't ask some one to "call CQ while I go <do whatever>". So you set the CQ repeat to 1.1 seconds and go <do whatever>. I'd never admit to the former ...... Hank K8DD -- "I knew that God put m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00476.html (11,635 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1977 vanity calls (was Watch your dits this weekend) (score: 1)
Author: "hank.k8dd" <hank.k8dd@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:07:31 -0500
In the second round of the "2 letter call" program they were free and you could put in for up to 26 choices. No VanityHQ web sites. No web sites, so all we had to go by was the call book and QST Sile
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00548.html (10,716 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] anti-contest petition MMSN (score: 1)
Author: "hank.k8dd" <hank.k8dd@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 09:07:31 -0500
I took a look at that site, and it was helpful. It looks to me like is really counter-productive to their petition. We all know the major contests are on weekends. Everyone knows that. Even the MMSN!
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00097.html (10,934 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules? (score: 1)
Author: "hank.k8dd" <hank.k8dd@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 22:41:05 -0500
humor Of course it is time for an evaluation of the scoring rules. Doesn't this happen the week or two after most every contest? We just HAVE to level the playing field by changing the rules. /humor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00135.html (9,223 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] EF8M CQ WW CW (score: 1)
Author: "hank.k8dd" <hank.k8dd@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:15:48 -0500
Me too ...... I'm behind the same curve ...... But it does say "Disqualification of an entrant in any CQ contest will lead to check-log status in all CQ contests for a period of one year." But it doe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00311.html (8,977 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking with mismatched bands (score: 1)
Author: "hank.k8dd" <hank.k8dd@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 14:10:12 -0500
To error is to be receiving a 1 or 3 QSO penalty. Unless it's Sweepstakes, and then you can eliminate the band information. (But I'm not going to try that one!) K8DD _________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00079.html (9,673 bytes)

30. [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rookie Contest Rules (score: 1)
Author: "hank.k8dd" <hank.k8dd@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 17:51:05 -0500
It's really a good thing that there was not much in the way of internet when the NCJ Sprint rules were announced. Just consider those QSY rules as a new contest today. The ARRL Rookie Contest thread
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00175.html (7,638 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut Number "J" - ASSISTED or MULTI? (score: 1)
Author: "hank.k8dd" <hank.k8dd@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:23:09 +0000
But if I forget what was in the email before I get back to the radio, does it count an assisted or forgetful? Amazing the things you think of after coming off a 4 hr shift on 15M running NA! K8DD / Y
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00237.html (9,432 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut Number "J" - ASSISTED or MULTI? (score: 1)
Author: "hank.k8dd" <hank.k8dd@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 20:49:13 -0600
I worked a couple who kept sending only "QRP QRP QRP" every time I'd send TU. They were a couple of UT's who apparently wanted to get in the YN2WW log. I think they were the only ones who ID'ed with
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00273.html (15,520 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] What Do You Do about US Stations Calling US in ARRL DX? (score: 1)
Author: "hank.k8dd" <hank.k8dd@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 07:52:34 -0600
And along the same path ..... How about the DX stations who call DX stations in ARRL DX Contest? We had a couple dozen. Some got logged with DX as the state and some are blank (forced the QSO). Do we
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00289.html (10,350 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best callsign letters (score: 1)
Author: "hank.k8dd" <hank.k8dd@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:41:58 -0400
And when I use Del-Ta Del-Ta for phonetics I get a lot of Alpha Delta's from DX stations. When they realize it's "DD", they come back with Denmark Denmark. But If I use Denmark Denmark ..... they don
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00311.html (9,172 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best call sign letters (score: 1)
Author: "hank.k8dd" <hank.k8dd@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:27:25 -0400
If I ever hear "Kilomockingbird One TangoinParis NovemberSweepstakes" on SSB, I will respond with "Knickerbocker Eight Djibouti Djibouti" <over> -- "I knew that God put me on this earth to be on the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00365.html (9,429 bytes)

36. [CQ-Contest] [FS] 100' + Rohn 45 (score: 1)
Author: "hank.k8dd" <hank.k8dd@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:10:04 -0400
Get ready for the fall season! 10 straight sections of Rohn 45G - used, no rust at all, have most of the bolts in decent shape 1 straight section of Rohn 45G - new never used, with new bolts 1 straig
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00078.html (7,379 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu